IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.
Charanjit Singh Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 11709 of 2019
Decided On : 16-04-2024
Bail - Criminal Procedure - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - The court discussed the provisions of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., emphasizing the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, particularly in light of the petitioner's medical condition and the lack of incriminating evidence against him.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving serious charges including murder and arms offenses, asserting false implication and lack of direct evidence against him, while the state argued he was an aggressor in a violent protest.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no incriminating evidence against the petitioner, noted his prolonged custody and medical condition, and emphasized the principle that bail is the norm, leading to the conclusion that he should be granted bail.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the serious charges against him, his medical condition, and the lack of direct evidence linking him to the alleged offenses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, particularly when the accused has been in custody for an extended period without incriminating evidence and has a valid medical condition.
Result: The petition for regular bail is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, J.
The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been invoked seeking regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 130, dated 21.10.2015 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 302, 307, 34 IPC (Offence under Sections 201, 218 and 120-B IPC added later on) and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959 (under Sections 166-A, 194, 195 and 109 added vide order dated 10.03.2021) registered at Police Station Bajakhana, Ditrict Faridkot.
2. The contents of the FIR reads as under:-
3. Mr. R.S. Rai, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has contended that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has further contended that on 07.09.2015 order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridkot, imposing restriction under Section 144 Cr.P.C. from 08.09.2015 till 15.11.2015. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the direction of Sh. Paramraj Singh Umranangal IPS, th
Bail is the rule, not the exception, especially when there is no incriminating evidence and the accused has significant medical issues.
Bail granted in mob violence and police assault case amid communal tensions on grounds of trial pendency, presumption of innocence, parity with co-accused, completed investigation, clean antecedents,....
Grant of Bail - circumstances which are peculiar to the accused should also be a factor that must be taken into consideration while granting or refusing bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.