IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sumeet Goel, J.
Baldev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Karamjit Kaur @ Soni - Respondent
CRR (F) 796 of 2024
Decided On : 20-08-2024
Maintenance - Family Law - Cr.P.C. Section 125, BNSS Section 144 - The court interpreted the provisions for interim and ad-interim maintenance, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion and the moral obligations of a husband/father towards his family, ultimately setting aside the ad-interim maintenance order due to lack of compelling circumstances.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an order directing him to pay ad-interim maintenance to the respondents, arguing that there was no statutory basis for such an order under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and that the amount was excessive given the respondents' financial situation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while Section 125 of Cr.P.C. allows for interim maintenance, it does not explicitly provide for ad-interim maintenance. However, it recognized the court's implied power to grant such relief in exceptional circumstances, which were not present in this case.
Issues: Whether the court has the power to grant ad-interim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and whether the circumstances justified the grant of such maintenance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while there is no explicit provision for ad-interim maintenance, the court has implied powers to grant it in exceptional cases, but such powers must be exercised judiciously and based on compelling circumstances.
Result: The revision petition is allowed, and the order for ad-interim maintenance is set aside.
JUDGMENT :
Sumeet Goel, J.
Present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 02.05.2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ludhiana (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘concerned Family Court’) whereby the petitioner (herein) has been directed to make payment of ad- interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3500/- per month to respondent No.1 and Rs.2000/- per month to respondent No.3 from the date of application till the adjudication of the application for interim maintenance on merits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the impugned order dated 02.05.2024 is against the statute as there is no legislative mandate for grant of any ad-interim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C pending final disposal of an application for interim maintenance. Learned quantum counsel for the petitioner has further argued that, in any case, the of ad-interim maintenance awarded is on the higher side as respondent No.1 is a working lady and has sufficient income to maintain herself and the children. Thus, it has been prayed that the instant petition be accepted and the impugned order dated 02.05.2024 be set-aside.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has argued that the petitioner (herein) has been directed to pay ad-interim maintenance to tide over the difficulties being faced by the respondents (herein) during the pendency of application for interim maintenance. Learned counsel has further submitted that even if there is no statutory mandate in Cr.P.C., 1973 to grant d-interim maintenance yet, the factual matrix of the lis indicates that the ad-interim maintenance was required to be paid to the respondents (herein) in view of financial difficulties being faced by them. Thus, dismissal of the instant petition is prayed for.
4. This Court has heard learned counsel for the rival parties and have perused the record.
5. It would be apposite to refer herein to a judgment passed by this Court in case titled as Rahul Dewan vs. Micky Dewan and another 2024 PHHC:106589; relevant whereof reads as under:
The court affirmed that while Section 125 of Cr.P.C. does not explicitly provide for ad-interim maintenance, it can be granted by implication in exceptional circumstances, emphasizing the need for ju....
The court affirmed the implied power to grant ad-interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. to ensure social justice, despite the lack of explicit statutory provision.
An order of interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. is an intermediate order and thus revisable under Section 397(1); it was affirmed by the Court as not suffering from illegality.
A husband can contest a wife's claim for interim maintenance on grounds of adultery, but must provide sufficient evidence to support this claim.
The court emphasized the summary nature of the proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the objective to provide immediate relief to the applicant.
Interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. requires thorough financial assessment of both parties, with specific affidavits of assets and liabilities being crucial for the determination of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of speedy disposal of maintenance petitions under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. to prevent destitution and vagrancy, as well as the duty of....
The court established that maintenance claims under different statutes must be adjusted to prevent overlapping and ensure fair support for dependents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.