Back
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Surender @ Chhinda – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for quashing of fir based on compromise. (Para 1) |
| 2. citing previous judicial precedents for quashing. (Para 2) |
| 3. trial court's report on genuineness of compromise. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. high court's inherent power to quash under specific conditions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. quashing proceedings aligns with justice and consent of parties. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. final order to quash fir based on compromise. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
Aman Chaudhary, J.
Present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.345, dated 26.06.2020, under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC and Sections 10 , 24 of the EMIGRATION ACT , 1983 ( Sections 12 0-B, 344, 370, 371, 386 of IPC and Section 12 of PASSPORT ACT were added later by the police), registered at Police Station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 12.02.2021 (Annexure P-2).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies on the judgments passed by this Court in CRM-M-33091-2020 decided on 12.10.2020; CRM-M-34418-2022 decided on 10.11.2022; CRM-M-29568-2020 decided on 17.02.2021 and CRM- M-24799-2021 decided on 27.09.2021, wherein FIRs registered under Section 370 IPC ha
The power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise depends on the nature and gravity of the crime, and the impact on society. Serious offences cannot be fittingly quashed, but offences wi....
The High Court has inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the parties, in order to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of an....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
