IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Vikash – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-A-787-MA of 2018
Decided On : 02-07-2024
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
CRM-A-787-MA-2018
2. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2018 and they have a very good case on merit.
3. On the contrary, respondent's counsel submit that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent.
4. Leave to appeal granted.
5. The accused to execute a bond for a4endance within two months, undertaking to appear in this court, in case the appeal is allowed.
6. In Mahidul Sheikh v. State of Haryana, CRM-33030-2021 in CRA-S-363-2020, decided on 14-01-2022, Para 53, this Court observed,
7. Given above, within two months, the accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty-Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the petitioner before the Court.
8. In the alternative, the accused may furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), and hand over to the attesting Magistrate, a fixed deposit(s) for Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), made in favour of Chief Judicial Magistrate of the concerned district. Such Fixed deposits may be made from any of the banks where the stake of the State is more than 50%, or any of the well-established and stable private banks, with the clause of automatic renewal of principal, and the interest reverting to the linked account.
CRM-A-787-MA-2018
9. Such a fixed deposit need not necessarily be made from the account of the accused. If such a fixed deposit is made in physical form, i.e., on paper, then the original receipt shall be handed over to the concerned Court. If made online, then its printout, a4ested by any Advocate, and if possible, countersigned by the accused, shall be filed, and the depositor shall get the online liquidation disabled. The accused or his Advocate shall inform at the earliest to the concerned branch of the bank, that it has been tendered as surety. Such information be sent either by e-mail or by post/courier, about the fixed deposit, whether made on paper or in any other mode, along with its number as well as FIR number. After that, the accused shall hand over such proof along with endorsement to the concerned Court. It shall be total discretion of the accused to choose between surety bonds and fixed deposits. It shall also be open for the accused to apply for substitution of fixed deposit with surety bonds and vice-versa. Subject to the proceedings under S. 446 CrPC, if any, the entire amount of fixed deposit, less tax deducted at source, if any, shall be endorsed/returned to the depositor(s). Such Court shall have a lien over the deposits up to the expiry of the period mentioned under S. 437A CrPC, 1973, or until discharged by substitution as the case may be.
10. The attesting officer shall, on the reverse page of personal bonds, mention the permanent address of the accused along with the phone number(s), WhatsApp number (if any), e-mail (if any), and in case of any change, the Accused shall immediately
The court established that accused individuals should have flexible options for bail sureties, including personal bonds and fixed deposits, ensuring their rights are protected during the appeal proce....
The judgment established the principle that in cases involving the NDPS Act, the Court may consider suspending the sentence based on the quantity of the substance, the accused's conduct, and legal pr....
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations, the offender's criminal history, and the penal provisions imposed by the Legislature.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused can choose between surety bonds and fixed deposits as a condition for bail and suspension of sentence.
The judgment emphasizes the discretion of the court in granting bail, taking into account the nature of the offense, the petitioner's criminal antecedents, and the maximum sentence imposable for the ....
The court applied a balanced approach and considered the maximum sentence imposable for the offenses, as well as the directions in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and the pragmatic approach in Mahidul....
Bail amounts should depend on the accused's financial circumstances, prioritizing personal bonds over sureties to prevent undue hardship.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for judicious and compassionate exercise of discretion in bail decisions, along with the imposition of stringent conditions to prevent int....
The court balanced the accused's right to personal freedom with the necessity of a fair trial and imposed stringent conditions to prevent influencing the investigation, tampering with evidence, or in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.