SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 669

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Vikash – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-A-787-MA of 2018
Decided On : 02-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 4.
Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for Respondent No.3

The court established that accused individuals should have flexible options for bail sureties, including personal bonds and fixed deposits, ensuring their rights are protected during the appeal process.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 437A and 446 - Bail application against acquittal - Leave to appeal granted against the well-reasoned judgment of acquittal - The accused is required to furnish personal bonds and sureties as per the court's directives - The court emphasizes the accused's choice in providing surety or fixed deposits. (Paras 4, 7, 8, 9, 10)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court outlines the conditions under which bail may be granted, including the option for the accused to choose between surety bonds and fixed deposits, ensuring compliance with the stipulations of the bail order. (Paras 6, 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The application was filed against an acquittal in 2018, with the applicant asserting a strong case on merit, while the respondent's counsel argued for the upholding of the acquittal judgment.

Findings of Court:
The court granted leave to appeal, requiring the accused to execute bonds and providing options for bail conditions.

Issues: The main issues addressed include the merit of the acquittal and the conditions for granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the accused must have the option to choose between different modes of bail security, emphasizing the importance of the accused's discretion in this matter.

Result: Leave to appeal granted.

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J.

CRM-A-787-MA-2018

2. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2018 and they have a very good case on merit.

3. On the contrary, respondent's counsel submit that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent.

4. Leave to appeal granted.

5. The accused to execute a bond for a4endance within two months, undertaking to appear in this court, in case the appeal is allowed.

6. In Mahidul Sheikh v. State of Haryana, CRM-33030-2021 in CRA-S-363-2020, decided on 14-01-2022, Para 53, this Court observed,

    [53]. The pragmatic approach is that while granting bail with sureties, the "Court" and the "Arresting Officer" should give a choice to the accused to either furnish surety bonds or to handover a fixed deposit, or direct electronic money transfer where such facility is available, or creating a lien over his bank account. The accused should also have a further option to switch between the modes. The option lies with the accused to choose between the sureties and deposits and not with the Court or the arresting officer.

7. Given above, within two months, the accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty-Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the petitioner before the Court.

8. In the alternative, the accused may furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), and hand over to the attesting Magistrate, a fixed deposit(s) for Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), made in favour of Chief Judicial Magistrate of the concerned district. Such Fixed deposits may be made from any of the banks where the stake of the State is more than 50%, or any of the well-established and stable private banks, with the clause of automatic renewal of principal, and the interest reverting to the linked account.

CRM-A-787-MA-2018

9. Such a fixed deposit need not necessarily be made from the account of the accused. If such a fixed deposit is made in physical form, i.e., on paper, then the original receipt shall be handed over to the concerned Court. If made online, then its printout, a4ested by any Advocate, and if possible, countersigned by the accused, shall be filed, and the depositor shall get the online liquidation disabled. The accused or his Advocate shall inform at the earliest to the concerned branch of the bank, that it has been tendered as surety. Such information be sent either by e-mail or by post/courier, about the fixed deposit, whether made on paper or in any other mode, along with its number as well as FIR number. After that, the accused shall hand over such proof along with endorsement to the concerned Court. It shall be total discretion of the accused to choose between surety bonds and fixed deposits. It shall also be open for the accused to apply for substitution of fixed deposit with surety bonds and vice-versa. Subject to the proceedings under S. 446 CrPC, if any, the entire amount of fixed deposit, less tax deducted at source, if any, shall be endorsed/returned to the depositor(s). Such Court shall have a lien over the deposits up to the expiry of the period mentioned under S. 437A CrPC, 1973, or until discharged by substitution as the case may be.

10. The attesting officer shall, on the reverse page of personal bonds, mention the permanent address of the accused along with the phone number(s), WhatsApp number (if any), e-mail (if any), and in case of any change, the Accused shall immediately

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top