IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN MONGA, J.
The Chandigarh Administration/ State of U.T., Chandigarh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Aarti Devi (Since Deceased) through LRs – Respondents
RSA-891 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 08-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's evaluation of jurisdiction and administrative procedure. (Para 2 , 7 , 11) |
| 2. plaintiff's residence and eligibility under the rehabilitation scheme. (Para 3) |
| 3. details of the plaintiff's application and allegations of administrative inaction. (Para 4) |
| 4. no substantial question of law for appeal; jurisdiction properly established. (Para 10 , 12 , 19) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; orders upheld. (Para 20 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Arun Monga, J. (Oral)
CM-3429-C-2023
For the reasons stated in application, same is allowed. Delay of 76 days in filing appeal is condoned, subject to all just exceptions.
CM-3430-C-2023
This is an application filed by appellants under Order 41, Rule 27 CPC for permission to place on record letter dated 13.10.2015 (Annexure A-1) by way of additional evidence.
No grounds are made out to allow appellants to adduce additional evidence at this belated stage.
Dismissed.
Main case (O&M)
For convenience, parties herein are addressed as per the recitals before learned trial Court.
2. Having suffered concurrent adverse findings by the two Courts below, appellant/defendants are in second appeal before this Court assailing learned trial Court judgment and decree dated 18.11.2009, as upheld by learned First Appellate Court vide its judgment and decree dated 24.08.2022, whereby suit of the respondent- plaintiff was decreed and defendants were directed to issue allotment letter as well as to handover possession of Plinth Site No.1800, Sector 25, Chandigarh to plaintiff which was allotted to her in a draw of lot against her Jhuggi No.69/1, Janta Labour Colony, Sector 25, Chandigarh under the Rehabilitation Scheme known as licensing of tenements and sites and services in Chandigarh Scheme 199 subsequently amended in the year 1997, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of judgment.
3. Briefly stated, facts, as noticed by learned Courts, are as below:
"In nutshell, the facts of the present suit are that plaintiff along with his family had been residing in Sector 25, Chandigarh since long. The Chandigarh Administration framed a scheme namely 'Licensing of Tenement and Sites and Services Scheme 1979' for rehabilitation of Jhuggi Dwellers. Admittedly, various persons have been rehabilitated under the said scheme time to time. In pursuance to said scheme, the administration carried out the process of rehabilitation of the dwellers of Janta Labour Colony, Sector 25, Chandigarh.
2. It is averred in the suit that the basic scheme/notification issued by the Chandigarh Administration is dated 24.08.1979 and the same was amended as Licensing of Tenement and Sites and Services in Chandigarh Scheme 1979 in the year of 1997. It is averred that as per said scheme, the eligibility criteria for allotment of plinth/site against the jhuggi was primarily that "all persons who are bona fide residents of Labour Colonies and whose names are included in the voters list in force, on the date of election to the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, shall be eligible for allotment of site and tenement." It is further averred in the suit that the plaintiff along with her family had been residing in Sector 25, Chandigarh since long, being eligible plaintiff applied for allotment of side against his respective jhuggi under the rehabilitation scheme. Since the applicant was eligible, accordingly, Plinth Site No.1800, Sector 25, Chandigarh was allotted to her in a draw of lot. Thereafter, an allotment related letter dated 22.03.2014 was issued to the plaintiff and plaintiff was asked by the defendants to complete the formalities which were completed by the plaintiff. However, no allotment and possession letter has so far been issued and no possession of plinth handed over to the plaintiff despite repeated visits and requests to the concerned officials of the defendants.
3. It is averred in the suit that the plaintiff has been pursuing for getting allotment and possession since long but the defendants neither handed o
AI
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
Mandatory prior approval from the Assistant Collector is essential for land allotments under Section 122-C of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, making unauthorized claims invalid.
The court ruled that administrative decisions regarding allotment policies operate prospectively, ensuring that applicants who complied with prior requirements are not adversely affected by subsequen....
1. Interest will be calculated after the period of assured possession has elapsed – from when cause of action has arisen2. Arbitration is not a bar to consumer complaint
The principles of natural justice require that an allotment cannot be cancelled without due process, including notice and an opportunity to be heard.
A valid land allotment must be canceled before a subsequent allotment can be deemed lawful, reaffirming the plaintiffs' ownership rights and possession under the Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.