Back
G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Bharti Printers – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, J.
Challenge has been made to the sale notice dated 22.02.2023 (Annexure P-11), whereby the auction had taken place on 15.03.2023 for recovery of Rs. 6,15,97,680/- plus interest as on 06.11.2014. The property which has been put to sale is a residential house bearing No.279, Shivalik Enclave, NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh having plot size of 406.66 square yards. The same was done in pursuance to the proceedings initiated under Section 13 of the Securitization and Re-construction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
2. On having advance notice counsel for the respondent-Bank puts in appearance and has pointed out that the outstanding are to the tune of Rs. 17.52 crores since interest element has crept in.
3. Keeping in view the above, we are of the considered opinion that it is not for the Writ Court to exercise its extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, in view of the huge outstanding as the bank is only seeking to recover the same, especially keeping in view the law laid down in United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon & others (2010) 8 SCC 110. The principles laid down in the s
The SARFAESI Act provisions, including the enforcement of security interest, the rights of the borrower, the appeal process, and the non-maintainability of writ petitions against private financial in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
