SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.
Surinderpal Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRR-562 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 21-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sant Pal Singh Sidhu, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, DAG, Punjab.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 311 - Recall of witnesses - Application for recalling eight prosecution witnesses was dismissed due to lack of merit, having previously provided several opportunities for cross-examination, wherein the petitioner failed to act. The trial was notably prolonged over five years, with the court insisting on expedient proceedings. (Paras 4-15)

(B) Legal Representation - Accused's failure to present his counsel for cross-examination of witnesses was deemed a tactic for delaying the trial; no valid evidence was demonstrated to support claims of miscommunication or conflict with the Presiding Officer. (Paras 8-13)

Facts of the case:
Surinderpal Singh filed a revision petition against the dismissal of his application to recall prosecution witnesses during an ongoing trial for multiple charges including corruption. The application claimed that prior cross-examination opportunities were mishandled due to alleged conflicts with legal representation.

Findings of Court:
The trial Court's detailed order affirmed that sufficient opportunities were provided, rejecting claims of unjust treatment.

Issues: The primary issues involved the timeliness of witness recall, prior representation of the petitioner, and procedural rights in cross-examination.

Ratio Decidendi: Validity of witness recall was denied as the petitioner had intentionally missed prior opportunities, undermining claims of unfair trial conditions.

Result: Revision petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. application for recalling witnesses (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's procedural issues raised (Para 3 , 4)
3. trial court's decision on cross-examination (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. sufficient opportunities for cross-examination provided (Para 8 , 10 , 12)
5. petitioner's tactics found dilatory (Para 11 , 13 , 14)
6. impugned order upheld (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

The instant revision petition has been filed by accused/petitioner Surinderpal Singh assailing order dated 22.2.2023 vide which an application dated 20.2.2023 (Annexure P-3) under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for recalling 8 prosecution witnesses i.e. PW-20 Divleen Singh, PW-53 Surinder Kumar, PW-57 Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, PW-71 Ashish Kapoor, PW- 66 Inspector Inderpal Singh, PW-62 Arjun Singh, PW-8 Dharminder Singh and PW-74 Nageshwar Rao has been dismissed.

2. The petitioner alongwith another 10 accused is facing trial before the Special Court, SAS Nagar, Mohali in a case arising out of FIR No. 6 dated 8.6.2017 registered under Sections 420 , 465, 467, 468, 471, 506/120B IPC and sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Flying Squad-I, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. A large number of PWs have been cited. As many as 76 PWs have already been examined. The trial has been pending since the last about 5 years and directions for expeditious disposal have already been issued by this Court vide order dated 27.9.2022 passed in CRM-M-23331-2019 which have also been got extended on request of the Presiding Officer. The trial Court has virtually been proceeding on day-to-day basis having regard to the fact that a large number of accused have been arrayed and a large number of witnesses have been cited by the prosecution.

3. The witnesses sought to be recalled had been appearing before the trial Court on several dates and while they were cross-examined by some co-accused, some other voluntarily opted not to cross-examine. The petitioner Surinderpal Singh and co-accused Swaranjit Kaur did not come forward either to cross-examine or to voluntarily give up their right of cross-examination and consequently, the trial Court upon noticing that a large number of opportunities have already been afforded to the petitioner treated the cross-examination by petitioner as 'Nil' of aforesaid 8 witnesses on different dates between 4.1.2023 and 20.2.2023. While cross-examination of PW-20 Divleen Singh, PW-53 Surinder Kumar and PW-57 Sanjeev Kumar Gupta of petitioner was treated as 'Nil' on 4.1.2023; cross-examination of PW-71 Ashish Kapoor and PW-66 Inspector Inderpal Singh by petitioner was treated as 'Nil' on 5.1.2023; and cross-examination of PW-8 Dharminder Singh, PW-62 Arjun Singh and PW-74 Nageshwar Rao by petitioner was treated as 'Nil' on 20.2.2023. The application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was filed on 20.2.2023 (Annexure P-3) and was dismissed vide impugned order dated 22.2.2023 by passing an extensively detailed order by the trial Court, which is assailed by way of filing instant revision petition.

4. The grounds set forth in the application dated 20.2.2023 (Annexure P-3) for recalling the said 8 PWs are that there was some oral understanding between the petitioner and the Presiding Officer before the onset of winter vacation to the effect that the accused shall conduct cross-examination of the witnesses in question on or after 6.1.2023 and accordingly, an application for deferring the cross-examination was filed by the petitioner for deferring the cross-examination till 6.1.2023. It is averred that in the meantime, there was some conflict between the accused/applicant and the Presiding Officer and resultantly the counsel representing the accused/applicant chose not to appear so as to stay out of the conflict and on account of which their cross-examination came to be recorded as "Opportunity given/Nil". It is further averred that since the conflict between the petitioner and the Presiding Off

                                                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                          1
                                                          2
                                                          3
                                                          4
                                                          5
                                                          6
                                                          7
                                                          8
                                                          9
                                                          10
                                                          11
                                                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                          supreme today icon
                                                          logo-black

                                                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                          Please visit our Training & Support
                                                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                          qr

                                                          Scan Me!

                                                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                          whatsapp-icon Back to top