SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2130

HARKESH MANUJA
Bachittar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 16.03.2018 and 03.01.2023 passed by the Courts below; whereby a suit for possession by way of specific performance, filed at the instance of respondent / plaintiff has been decreed.

2. Briefly stating, based on an agreement to sell dated 08.11.2010, the respondent / plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance against appellant-defendant. It was pleaded therein that the total sale consideration was Rs. 8,00,000/-; out of which Rs. 2 lacs was paid as earnest money; 08.11.2011 being the target date, though later extended up to 10.05.2012. However, the appellant/ defendant failed to get the sale deed executed thereby compelling the respondent/ plaintiff to file the suit for possession by way of specific performance.

3. Upon notice, the appellant/ defendant appeared and disputed the factum of execution of agreement to sell by pleading it to be forged and fabricated document.

4. The trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 16.03.2018 decreed the suit in favour of respondent/ plaintiff. Aggrieved thereof, the appellant/ defendant filed first

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top