SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2121

HARKESH MANUJA
Akash Jain – Appellant
Versus
Rupinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been made to the judgments and decrees dated 28.04.2015 and 17.07.2017 passed by the Courts below, whereby, suit for recovery filed at the instance of appellants stands dismissed.

2. Briefly stating the facts of the case are that an agreement to sell came to be executed between the appellants-plaintiffs and the respondent-defendant on 08.02.2006, pertaining to the land situated in village Ghullu Majra, District Patiala with appellants-plaintiffs being the purchasers and the respondent-defendant as the owner. The total amount of sale consideration was Rs.16.60 lacs per acre, out of which, Rs.14 lacs were paid as an earnest money and 15.06.2006 was the last date for the execution of the sale deed.

3. It was further submitted in the plaint that the appellants-plaintiffs visited the office of the Sub-Registrar on the date fixed along with the balance sale consideration, but sale deed could not be executed. Followed by that, the suit for recovery of earnest money with interest was filed with the averments that as per the terms of the agreement, the respondent-defendant could not forfeit the same.

4. On the other h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top