IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA, J.
Hitesh Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Sat Pal & Anr. – Respondents
CR NO.4991 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 09-08-2024
JUDGMENT
Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)
By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to an order dated 01.08.2023 passed by the Rent Controller, Sangrur, whereby in an eviction petition filed at the instance of respondents/landlords, provisional assessment/interim assessment of rent was made by the learned Rent Controller.
2. Briefly stating, claiming themselves to be owners/landlords of the tenanted premises i.e. double storey House No.F-24 situated at Officer Colony, Sangrur, an eviction petition invoking Section 20 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 came to be filed against the petitioner/tenant on the grounds of arrears of rent from August 2019 onwards as well as his personal necessity.
3. Upon appearance, petitioner/tenant disputed the factum qua arrears of rent. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the Rent Controller, Sangrur vide order dated 01.08.2023 assessed the provisional rent payable by the petitioner/tenant w.e.f. 01.03.2020 to 31.07.2023 @ Rs. 12,000/- per month besides interest and cost(s) etc.
4. Impugning the aforesaid order dated 01.08.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, there is no provision which enables the Rent Controller to pass any order regarding determination of provisional rent and, thus, the impugned order was wholly without jurisdiction and accordingly liable to be set aside.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the respondent while opposing the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner submits that in terms of Section 25 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act'), the Rent Controller was duly competent to make assessment of interim rent in case of dispute been raised by the tenant and, thus, the impugned order warrants no interference.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book.
7. For the purpose of adjudication of present revision petition, a close look at Section 25 of the Act would be essential and, thus, the same is extracted hereunder:-
Perusal of Section 25(2) of the aforesaid Act, clearly empowers the Rent Controller to fix an interim rent besides other charges in relation to the tenanted premises during pendency of proceedings for recovery of possession, in case any dispute regarding amou
The Rent Controller has the authority to fix interim rent during eviction proceedings under Section 25 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, and the terms 'provisional' and 'interim' are interchangeable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the process of provisional rent assessment by the Rent Controller, subject to final adjudication, and the possibility of refunding the excess amoun....
Accurate assessment of provisional rent and providing an opportunity for the tenant to tender the remaining amount if the ultimate due amount exceeds the provisional rent assessed by the court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.