SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 949

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA, J.
Hitesh Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Sat Pal & Anr. – Respondents
CR NO.4991 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 09-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate Mr. Satinder Singla, Advocate and Ms. Suman Rani, Advocate; For the Respondents

The Rent Controller has the authority to fix interim rent during eviction proceedings under Section 25 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, and the terms 'provisional' and 'interim' are interchangeable.

Headnote:(A) Punjab Rent Act, 1995 - Section 25 - Eviction proceedings - The Rent Controller assessed provisional rent in an eviction petition filed by landlords against a tenant for arrears of rent and personal necessity - The petitioner contended that the Rent Controller lacked jurisdiction to determine provisional rent - The court found that Section 25(2) empowers the Rent Controller to fix interim rent during disputes over rent - The terms 'provisional' and 'interim' are interchangeable in this context, and no jurisdictional error was present. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The landlords filed an eviction petition against the tenant for arrears of rent from August 2019 and personal necessity, leading to a provisional rent assessment by the Rent Controller.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the Rent Controller had the authority to assess interim rent under Section 25(2) of the Act, dismissing the petitioner's claims of jurisdictional error.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Rent Controller had the jurisdiction to assess provisional rent in the context of eviction proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Rent Controller's use of 'provisional rent' instead of 'interim rent' did not constitute a jurisdictional error, as both terms serve a similar purpose in the context of temporary arrangements during disputes.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)

By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to an order dated 01.08.2023 passed by the Rent Controller, Sangrur, whereby in an eviction petition filed at the instance of respondents/landlords, provisional assessment/interim assessment of rent was made by the learned Rent Controller.

2. Briefly stating, claiming themselves to be owners/landlords of the tenanted premises i.e. double storey House No.F-24 situated at Officer Colony, Sangrur, an eviction petition invoking Section 20 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 came to be filed against the petitioner/tenant on the grounds of arrears of rent from August 2019 onwards as well as his personal necessity.

3. Upon appearance, petitioner/tenant disputed the factum qua arrears of rent. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the Rent Controller, Sangrur vide order dated 01.08.2023 assessed the provisional rent payable by the petitioner/tenant w.e.f. 01.03.2020 to 31.07.2023 @ Rs. 12,000/- per month besides interest and cost(s) etc.

4. Impugning the aforesaid order dated 01.08.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, there is no provision which enables the Rent Controller to pass any order regarding determination of provisional rent and, thus, the impugned order was wholly without jurisdiction and accordingly liable to be set aside.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the respondent while opposing the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner submits that in terms of Section 25 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act'), the Rent Controller was duly competent to make assessment of interim rent in case of dispute been raised by the tenant and, thus, the impugned order warrants no interference.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book.

7. For the purpose of adjudication of present revision petition, a close look at Section 25 of the Act would be essential and, thus, the same is extracted hereunder:-

    "Section 25. Payment of rent during eviction proceedings:-.

    (1) During the proceedings for recovery of possession under section 20, a tenant shall ensure timely payment of rent and other charges at the rate at which these were being paid immediately before the commencement of the proceeding.

    (2) if any proceeding for recovery of possession, there is any dispute as to the amount of rent payable by the tenant, the Rent Authority shall, within fifteen days of the date of the first hearing of the proceeding fix an interim rent and other charges in relation to the premises to be paid or deposited within one month of the date of which the interim rent is fixed for such further time as a Rent Authority may allow in this behalf

    (3) If in any proceeding for recovery of possession there is any dispute as to the person or persons to whom the rent is payable the Rent Authority may direct the tenant to deposit with the Rent Authority the amount payable by him under sub-section (2) as the case may be, and in such case no person shall be entitled to withdraw the amount in deposit until the Rent Authority decides the dispute and makes an order for payment of the same.

    (4) If the Rent Authority is satisfied that any dispute referred to in sub-section (3) has been raised by a tenant for reasons which are false or frivolous, the Rent Authority may order the defence against eviction to be struck out and proceed with the hearing of the application.

    (5) If a tenant fails to make payment or deposit as required by this section, the Rent Authority may order the defence against eviction to be struck out and proceed with the hearing of the application."

Perusal of Section 25(2) of the aforesaid Act, clearly empowers the Rent Controller to fix an interim rent besides other charges in relation to the tenanted premises during pendency of proceedings for recovery of possession, in case any dispute regarding amou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top