IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSH BUNGER, J.
Rajesh Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M NO. 58066 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 27-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the alleged offense. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's claims of innocence and argument for bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's assessment of custody duration and case progress. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal principle regarding consideration of prior offenses. (Para 11) |
| 5. conditions for granting bail. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. court's final remarks and order. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J.
Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short "Cr.P.C.") for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.323 dated 28.05.2022 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 3 -A, 4, 6(a), 23 of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (here-in-after referred as 'PNDT Act') ( Sections 3 , 5 and 6 of the 'PNDT Act' added later on) and Sections 420 and 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860, (hereinafter referred as 'IPC') at Police Station Karnal Civil Lines, District Karnal.
2. Status report by way of an affidavit of Sh. Mukesh Kumar, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarter), Karnal, on behalf of State of Haryana, has been filed, which is already on record.
3. Custody certificate dated 25.03.2023 of the petitioner has been filed by learned State Counsel in the Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
4. The prosecution case is that on 28.05.2022, Deputy Civil Surgeon, PC-PNDT, Karnal came at the police station and presented an application alleging on the basis of secret information that a mediator Nasib Singh is indulging in the practice of illegal sex determination of foetus after getting ultrasound conducted in Karnal for a fee of Rs.40,000/-. The Civil Surgon, Karnal vide order dated 28.05.2022, constituted a raiding party headed by Dr. Seenu Chaudhary, Deputy Civil Surgeon, PC-PNDT Act to apprehend the culprits, while a four month pregnant woman had already been identified as decoy customer and through her, an amount of Rs.25,000/- had already been transferred online into the account of Nasib Singh. On 28.05.2022, the raiding team handed over currency notes amounting to Rs.15,000/- to the decoy customer for making remaining payment and at about 10:30 a.m., Nasib Singh and Rajesh Kumar (present petitioner) contacted the decoy customer and called her at Old Bus Stand, Karnal at 11:00 a.m. Thereafter, the decoy customer handed over Rs.15,000/- cash to Nasib Singh and both the said persons took the decoy customer to Good Hopes Diagnostic Centre near Old Bus Stand for sex determination of the foetus. Before conducting the ultrasound examination, Form-F was filled up and receipt of Rs.1000/- was obtained. After ultrasound, both the said persons took the decoy customer towards Old Bus Stand and Nasib Singh told the decoy customer that the foetus was of a girl. Thereafter, both the said persons left the decoy customer there and boarded a bus going towards Kaithal. In the meantime, the decoy customer disclosed to the raiding team that the said persons had disclosed sex of the foetus to her as girl and upon hearing this, the raiding team intercepted the bus and apprehended both the said persons. From their personal search, currency notes amounting to Rs.14,000/-, which had been handed over by the raiding team to the decoy customer, were recovered from the possession of Nasib Singh. Further, from the search of black bag being carried by said persons, a huge cache of medicines were also recovered. Drug Control Officer, Karnal was called on the spot. The recovered currency notes and mobile phones of the culprits were taken into possession by the raiding team. In the said occurrence, the role of hospital also appears to be suspicious. A prayer was made to take necessary action against the culprits. On the basis of said application and the documents/material appended therewith, the present FIR was registered and the petitioner was arrested.
5. Thereafter, petitioner applied for regular bail, however t
The court considered the role attributed to the petitioner and the grant of bail to a similarly placed co-accused as key factors in allowing the bail application.
The court established that anticipatory bail in cases involving violations of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act is deniable due to the severe societal impact and the necessity for custodial int....
The court emphasized that bail should not be denied solely based on prior criminal history, focusing instead on the sufficiency of evidence and the likelihood of the accused appearing for trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.