Gora Lal Goyal. vs Ravinder Kumar. - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2394

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2394

JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Gora Lal Goyal. – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kumar. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate; For the Petitioners
Dr. Rao P.S. Girwan, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab for Respondent No.2.

Table of Content
1. background and context of the property fraud case (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. arguments regarding the culpability of ravinder kumar (Para 6 , 7)
3. explanation of section 319 cr.p.c. invocation requirements (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. application of judicial discretion in summoning additional accused (Para 13)
5. dismissal of the petition (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.(ORAL)

The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of the judgment dated 23.08.2016 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda whereby the revision petition against the order dated 06.04.2016 (Annexure P-3) passed by the JMIC, Bathinda summoning the respondent No.1 under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been allowed in FIR No.115 dated 18.07.2014 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 420 /34 IPC at Police Station Canal Colony, Bathinda.

2. The brief facts as emanating from the pleadings are that one Gora Lal Goyal (petitioner No.1/complainant) got registered the aforementioned FIR with the allegations that accused Mohan Lal was the owner in possession of a plot measuring 300 sq. yards comprising in Khasra No.4757 min (0-6) Khata No.1490/6749/2 situated at Street No.