SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
Jagtar Singh & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRWP-3939 of 2024 (O & M)
Decided On : 01-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Dhillon, Advocate; For the Petitioners

Individuals in live-in relationships are entitled to protection of life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, similar to those in formal marriages.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Protection of life and liberty - Petitioners in a live-in relationship sought protection from private respondents - Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to assess threat perception and take appropriate action - Previous judgments recognized the right to choose a partner and the need for protection in such relationships. (Paras 9, 10, 12, 13)

(B) Live-in Relationships - Legal recognition and protection - The court affirmed that individuals in live-in relationships are entitled to equal protection under the law, similar to those in formal marriages, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding their rights. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, in a live-in relationship, sought protection from threats posed by family members. Petitioner no.1 had a deceased wife, and petitioner no.2 was previously married but sought mutual divorce. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court recognized the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 and directed the police to consider the petitioners' representation regarding their safety. (Paras 9, 12)

Issues: The main issues included the legal status of live-in relationships and the necessity of protection from familial threats. (Paras 9, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right to life and liberty encompasses the right to choose a partner, whether through marriage or a live-in relationship, and emphasized the need for protection against threats. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to assess threat perception and provide protection if necessary.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)

The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate directions to official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from private respondents No.4 and 5.

2. Petitioner no.1 is stated to be born on 15.05.1980 and for this purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhar Card (Annexure P-1). Petitioner no.2 is stated to be born on 06.08.1984 and for the said purpose, reference has been made to Aadhaar card (Annexure P-2). It is stated that the petitioners are in a "Live in Relationship" since petitioner no.1-Jagtar Singh had earlier solemnized a marriage but his wife had died few years back and the children born out of this wedlock are residing with him (petitioner No.1) whereas petitioner No.2 was earlier married to one Harcharan Singh and had filed a petition seeking mutual divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The a child born out of this wedlock is residing with his father-Harcharan Singh.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 18.05.2021 passed in CRWP-4521-2021 titled as "Pardeep Singh and another v. State of Haryana and others" has granted protection in a case where the petitioners were living in a "Live in Relationship".

4. Learned counsel has further relied upon an order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 03.09.2021, passed in CRWP-7874-2021 titled as "Paramjit Kaur and another v. State of Punjab and others" as per which although the divorce petition filed by petitioner no.2 therein was dismissed, yet this Court had granted protection to the petitioners. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon an order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.11.2021 passed in CRWP010411-2021 Amandeep Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors. as per which in a case where one of the parties was married and was living in with another person other than her husband, this Court had granted protection to the petitioners.

5. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioners have given a representation dated 30.04.2024 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot, District Faridkot and they would be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to look into the said representation and after considering threat perception to the petitioners, to take appropriate action.

6. Notice of motion to respondents Nos.1 to 3 only.

7. On advance notice, Ms. Ramta K Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents Nos.1 to 3 and has stated that he has no objection in case respondent no.2 is directed to look into the representation of the petitioners on the aspect of threat perception and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law.

8. This Court has heard learned counsel for the parties.

9. In Pardeep Singh's (supra), a co-ordinate Bench of this Court has held as under:-

    " The Constitution of India is the Supreme Law of the land. Right to life and liberty is enshrined therein and is treated as a basic feature. The said right includes the right of an individual to full development of his/her potential in accordance with his/her choice and wish and for such purpose, he/she is entitled to choose a partner of his/her choice. The individual also has the right to formalize the relationship with the partner through marriage or to adopt the non-formal approach of a live in relationship. The concept of live-in-relationships has crept into our society from western nations and initially, found acceptance in the metropolitan cities, probably because, individuals felt that formalization of a relationship through marriage was not necessary for complete fulfillment. Education played a great role in development of this concept. Slowly, the concept has percolated into small towns and villages also as is evident from this petition. This shows t

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top