SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2403

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
Mahesh Gupta – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M-63455 of 2023
Decided On : 16-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, Asst. A.G., Haryana.

Withdrawal of a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act leads to quashing of FIR under Section 174A IPC, as continuing proceedings is an abuse of process.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 174A - Quashing of FIR - Petition allowed as complaint under Section 138 of NI Act was withdrawn due to settlement - Continuation of proceedings under Section 174A IPC deemed an abuse of process. (Paras 1, 9, 10, 13)

(B) Legal Principles - A co-ordinate Bench has previously established that if the main petition under Section 138 stands withdrawn, continuation of proceedings under Section 174A IPC is improper. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner issued a cheque which was dishonoured, leading to a complaint under the NI Act. The petitioner was declared a proclaimed person but later compromised the matter, resulting in the withdrawal of the complaint.

Findings of Court:
The FIR was quashed as the underlying complaint was withdrawn, and proceeding further would be an abuse of process.

Issues: Whether the FIR under Section 174A IPC should continue after the withdrawal of the main complaint under Section 138.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that continuation of proceedings under Section 174A IPC is unwarranted when the main complaint is withdrawn.

Result: FIR quashed.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)

This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR No.732 dated 21.07.2018 (Annexure P-2) registered under Section 174A of IPC at Police Station Ballabhgarh City, Faridabad which was registered consequent to the order dated 02.06.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Faridabad (Annexure P-1) in NACT/482/2017 under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act, declaring the petitioner as proclaimed person.

2. The brief facts of the case are that in discharge of his legal liability, the petitioner/accused issued a cheque for an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- in favour of the complainant. The said cheque came to be dishonoured. Pursuant thereto, as no payment was made in lieu of the dishonoured cheque, a complaint under Sections 138 & 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act came to be instituted against the petitioner/accused and he was summoned to face trial. Subsequently, he was declared a proclaimed person vide order dated 02.06.2018 (Annexure P-1).

3. Thereafter, a compromise was effected between the parties and the complaint was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the order dated 12.09.2023 (Annexures P-3 & P-4). In view of the dismissal of the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of the compromise, the present petition for quashing of aforesaid FIR No.732 dated 21.07.2018 (Annexure P-2) registered under Section 174A of IPC at Police Station Ballabhgarh City, Faridabad came to be registered.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused submits that he had wrongly been declared a proclaimed person and on learning about the same, the petitioner compromised the matter with the complainant. Thereafter, on 12.09.2023, the counsel for the complainant in the Trial Court got recorded his statement that as per his instructions, the complainant did not want to proceed further with the present complaint and wanted to withdraw the same. Based on the said statement, the complaint was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn on 12.09.2023.

5. The learned State counsel has opposed the present petition and has submitted that the FIR has been correctly registered.

6. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and has perused the paper-book.

7. From the above-said facts and circumstances, it is apparent that the present FIR was registered in view of the fact that the petitioner was declared as a proclaimed person in the proceeding under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The impugned complaint itself has been withdrawn.

8. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-43813-2018 titled as "Baldev Chand Bansal v. State of Haryana and another", decided on 29.01.2019 has held as under:-

    "Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.64 dated 15.02.2017 filed under Section 174A of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Sector-5, Panchkula and all other subsequent proceedings arising thereof as well as order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the trial Court vide which a direction was issued to register the aforesaid FIR.

    xxx xxx xxx

    Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decisions rendered by this Court in " Vikas Sharma v. Gurpreet Singh Kohli and another (supra), 2017 (3) L.A.R.584, Microqual Techno Limited and others v. State of Haryana and another, 2015 (32) RCR (Criminal) 790 and "Rajneesh Khanna v. State of Haryana and another" 2017 (3) L.A.R. 555 wherein in an identical circumstance, this Court has held that since the main petition filed under Section 138 of the Act stands withdrawn in view of an amicable settlement between the parties, therefore, continuation of proceedings under Section 174A of IPC shall be nothing but an abuse of the process of law.

    xxx xxx xxx

    In view of the same, I find merit in the present petition and accordingly, present petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Panchkula as well as FIR No.64 dated 15.02.2017 registered und

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top