SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2361

KARAMJIT SINGH
Sunita Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Deepak Gihotra, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. C.M. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-UOI.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Karamjit Singh, J. (Oral)

The present appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (in short 'the Act'), is directed against the order of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (in short 'the Tribunal') dated 17.11.2016, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants, who are parents of deceased Ravinder Singh Chauhan, has been rejected.

2. The brief facts of the case of the appellants are that deceased Ravinder Singh Chauhan was holding MST (Monthly Seasonal Ticket) and was travelling in a train No.54011 Delhi-Rewari, on 6.8.2012 and an untoward incident took place and Ravinder Singh Chauhan died in the area of Railway Station Patli.

3. The claim petition was contested by respondent and the Tribunal framed the following issues:-

    i. Whether the deceased was bona-fide passenger of the train at the time of incident.

    ii. Whether the incident is covered within ambit of Section 123(c)(2) read with Section 124-A of the Railways Act.

    iii. Whether the applicants are only dependents of the deceased.

    iv. Relief.

4. The appellants adduced evidence by way of affidavit of Dalvir Singh Chauhan, father of the deceased and produced inquest report prep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top