SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI, JJ.
Gobindgarh Educational And Social Welfare Trust – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-15174 of 1998
Decided On : 18-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. O.P. Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Soni, Advocate; For the Petitioner
For the Respondent: Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.3- Gram Panchayat.

The Gram Panchayat can only alienate shamlat deh lands for village benefit; any resolution lacking proof of ownership is legally invalid, and jurisdictional overreach by the Collector is impermissible.

Headnote:(A) Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 - Sections 5 and 6 - Resolution by Gram Panchayat concerning alienation of shamlat deh lands was invalid as such lands must be utilized for the benefit of village proprietors and must be vested in the Panchayat - The validity of the alienation challenged was deemed questionable due to lack of evidence showing the lands in question were indeed shamlat deh lands - Collector exceeded jurisdiction in making a declaratory decree of ownership without proper evidence and legal basis. (Paras 4, 5, 7, 9, 10)

(B) Judicial Review - The appellate authority must operate within the limitations of its jurisdiction and cannot issue declaratory decrees unless properly empowered by a clear record of uncontested evidence regarding ownership of the lands, necessitating a title suit for such declarations. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition challenges a Resolution by the Gram Panchayat alienating certain lands to an individual, arguing that this resolution was unjustified as the lands in question were in dispute and may not fall under the shamlat deh provisions.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the Collector's decision lacked jurisdiction for making a declaratory judgment without a title suit being filed, therefore quashing the collector's order.

Issues: The main issues included whether the lands were shamlat deh lands, the jurisdiction of the Collector to issue a declaratory decree, and whether the alienation was in line with the provisions of the Act of 1961.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Collector’s jurisdiction was limited and could not extend to issuing a declaratory decree without clear evidence that the lands belonged to shamlat deh; hence the resolution was to be rescinded.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to alienation based on statutory rights. (Para 1 , 2)
2. judicial review of collector's jurisdiction and errors. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. writ petition outcome quashing prior order. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

The gravamen of the lis, as encapsulated in the instant writ petition, is that, through a Resolution made on 28.04.1995, the petition lands comprised in Khasra No.90, 93, 94 and 95, became alienated by the Gram Panchayat concerned, in favour of co-respondent No.2, petitioner herein.

2. The said Resolution, thus leading to the making(s) of alienations of the Khasra numbers (supra), resulted in an appeal under Section 6 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1961'), being instituted thereagainst, by the aggrieved proprietors, over the disputed Khasra numbers (supra), who are impleaded as co-respondents No.4 to 7 hereins. The said appeal succeeded, through the makings of Annexure P-22, leading the aggrieved therefrom, to institute the instant writ petition before this Court, whereby, a challenge is thrown to Annexure P-22.

3. The challenged Resolution of the Gram Panchayat concerned, and, which has resulted in the making of Annexure P-22, was made in terms of Section 5 of the Act of 1961. Therefore, it is but imperative to extract the relevant sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Act of 1961, provisions whereof become extracted hereinafter.

    "5. Regulation of use and occupation, etc., of lands vested or deemed to have been vested in Panchayats.- (1) All lands vested or deemed to have been vested in a Panchayat under this Act, shall be utilised or, disposed of by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village concerned in the manner prescribed:

    Provided that where two or more villages have a common Panchayat, Shamilat Deh of each village shall be utilised and disposed of, by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of that village:

    Provided further that where there are two or more shamilat tikkas in a village, the Shamilat tikka shall be utilised and disposed of, by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of that tikka:

    Provided further that where the area of land in shamilat deh of any village so vested or deemed to have been vested in Panchayat is in excess of twenty-five per cent of the total area of that village (excluding abadi deh) then twenty-five per cent of such total area shall be left to the Panchayat and out of the remaining area of shamilat deh an area up to the extent of twentyfive per cent of such total area shall be utilised for the settlement of landless tenants and other tenants ejected or to be ejected of that village and the remaining area of shamilat deh, if any, shall be utilised for distribution to small land owners of that village subject to the provisions relating to [permissible area under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972, by the Assistant Collector of the first grade] in consultation with the Panchayat [in such manner and on payment of such amount as may be prescribed]"

4. The above extracted provision bestows a statutory right in the Gram Panchayat concerned to, in respect of all lands vested or deemed to have been vested in the Panchayat under the Act of 1961, thus dispose of such lands but with a rider, that the alienation(s) or disposal(s) of such lands rather being for the benefit of the village proprietary body concerned. Moreover, the manner of disposal or alienation of such shamlat deh lands, is prescribed to be made in the manner, as detailed in the statutory provisions, thus engrafted in Section 5 of the Act of 1961. Therefore, the Gram Panchayat concerned became well enabled to alienate or dispose of shamlat deh lands, but, only for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village concerned, besides in the manner prescribed in the said provision.

5. Imperatively so, the instant alienation(s) or disposal(s), through a Resolution beco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top