IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI, JJ.
Gobindgarh Educational And Social Welfare Trust – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-15174 of 1998
Decided On : 18-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to alienation based on statutory rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial review of collector's jurisdiction and errors. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. writ petition outcome quashing prior order. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The gravamen of the lis, as encapsulated in the instant writ petition, is that, through a Resolution made on 28.04.1995, the petition lands comprised in Khasra No.90, 93, 94 and 95, became alienated by the Gram Panchayat concerned, in favour of co-respondent No.2, petitioner herein.
2. The said Resolution, thus leading to the making(s) of alienations of the Khasra numbers (supra), resulted in an appeal under Section 6 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1961'), being instituted thereagainst, by the aggrieved proprietors, over the disputed Khasra numbers (supra), who are impleaded as co-respondents No.4 to 7 hereins. The said appeal succeeded, through the makings of Annexure P-22, leading the aggrieved therefrom, to institute the instant writ petition before this Court, whereby, a challenge is thrown to Annexure P-22.
3. The challenged Resolution of the Gram Panchayat concerned, and, which has resulted in the making of Annexure P-22, was made in terms of Section 5 of the Act of 1961. Therefore, it is but imperative to extract the relevant sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Act of 1961, provisions whereof become extracted hereinafter.
"5. Regulation of use and occupation, etc., of lands vested or deemed to have been vested in Panchayats.- (1) All lands vested or deemed to have been vested in a Panchayat under this Act, shall be utilised or, disposed of by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village concerned in the manner prescribed:
Provided that where two or more villages have a common Panchayat, Shamilat Deh of each village shall be utilised and disposed of, by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of that village:
Provided further that where there are two or more shamilat tikkas in a village, the Shamilat tikka shall be utilised and disposed of, by the Panchayat for the benefit of the inhabitants of that tikka:
Provided further that where the area of land in shamilat deh of any village so vested or deemed to have been vested in Panchayat is in excess of twenty-five per cent of the total area of that village (excluding abadi deh) then twenty-five per cent of such total area shall be left to the Panchayat and out of the remaining area of shamilat deh an area up to the extent of twentyfive per cent of such total area shall be utilised for the settlement of landless tenants and other tenants ejected or to be ejected of that village and the remaining area of shamilat deh, if any, shall be utilised for distribution to small land owners of that village subject to the provisions relating to [permissible area under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972, by the Assistant Collector of the first grade] in consultation with the Panchayat [in such manner and on payment of such amount as may be prescribed]"
4. The above extracted provision bestows a statutory right in the Gram Panchayat concerned to, in respect of all lands vested or deemed to have been vested in the Panchayat under the Act of 1961, thus dispose of such lands but with a rider, that the alienation(s) or disposal(s) of such lands rather being for the benefit of the village proprietary body concerned. Moreover, the manner of disposal or alienation of such shamlat deh lands, is prescribed to be made in the manner, as detailed in the statutory provisions, thus engrafted in Section 5 of the Act of 1961. Therefore, the Gram Panchayat concerned became well enabled to alienate or dispose of shamlat deh lands, but, only for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village concerned, besides in the manner prescribed in the said provision.
5. Imperatively so, the instant alienation(s) or disposal(s), through a Resolution beco
AI
The Gram Panchayat can only alienate shamlat deh lands for village benefit; any resolution lacking proof of ownership is legally invalid, and jurisdictional overreach by the Collector is impermissibl....
The presumption of truth in revenue records prevails unless cogent evidence is presented to the contrary, affirming the Gram Panchayat's ownership over disputed lands.
The court affirmed that the Gram Panchayat's claim to ownership over the disputed khasra number was valid, emphasizing the binding nature of the Director's order correcting clerical errors.
The court emphasized that mere claims of ownership are insufficient; prima facie evidence of title must be established to invoke eviction proceedings under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principle of res judicata in civil proceedings, as enshrined in Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to give finality ....
The court emphasized the necessity for procedural fairness and detailed reasoning in administrative decisions, particularly regarding the validity of documents and the rights of affected parties.
The eviction process under the Haryana Village Common Land Act requires substantiation with relevant documents; mere claims of disputed title without evidence are insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.