IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE, JJ.
Pardeep Sharma – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 29387 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for inquiry into election certificates. (Para 1) |
| 2. allegation of non-recognized educational certificate. (Para 2) |
| 3. acknowledgment of status report by district officer. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 4. discussion on disqualification and ongoing inquiries. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 5. court orders inquiry and action as per law. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Lisa Gill, J.
Prayer in this writ petition is for directing the official respondents to take action on representation dated 22.11.2022 (Annexure P- 4), filed by the petitioner seeking an inquiry into the genuineness of educational certificates submitted by respondent no.5, who has been elected as Sarpanch of village Bhurri, Post Office Rajpur, Tehsil Ganaur, District Sonipat.
2. It is contended that educational certificate in question, furnished by respondent no.5 has been issued by the Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Bharat Gwalior, which is not a recognized Board. Reference has been made to instructions dated 05.11.2019 (Annexure P-7) from the Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana.
3. Status report by way of affidavit dated 08.02.2023 of Mr. Rajpal Chahal, District Development & Panchayat Officer, Sonipat, filed in Court today with a copy thereof to learned counsel for the petitioner, is taken on record subject to just exceptions.
4. Learned counsel for the State while referring to the status report dated 08.02.2023, submits that petitioner has deliberately concealed the factum of having filed an election petition challenging the election of respondent no.5 prior to filing of this writ petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer in this writ petition is not for setting aside election of respondent no.5 but for directing official respondents to take action on his representation dated 22.11.2022 alleging disqualification of respondent no.5 for holding the post in question in terms of Section 175 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short the Act).
5. Learned counsel for the State submits that keeping in view the nature of allegations indicating disqualification of the elected candidate in terms of Section 175 of the Act, Committee of Officers has already been constituted to look into genuineness of the certificate submitted, not only by respondent no.5 but in respect to a number of other certificates submitted by some of the elected Panches and Sarpanches in regard to their educational qualifications. Para 2 of the Status Report reads as under:-
"2. That in compliance of the State Election Commissioner, Haryana letter sr. no. SEC/4E-11/2022/5987 dated 18-11- 2022, the Deputy Commissioner cum District Election Officer, (Panchayat) Sonipat (respondent no. 3) vide letter sr. no. 8162-71 dated 28-11-2022 has already constituted a committee of officers comprising of City Magistrate, Sonipat as over all incharge, District Education Officer/District Elementary Officer, Sonipat, the concerned Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Sonipat (as secretary) and the concerned Block Education Officer (as its member) which will inquire into the disputed educational certificate in respect of the newly elected panch/Sarpanch District, Sonipat. The above mentioned committee is enquiring into the genuineness of the education certificates submitted alongwith the nomination form by the respectively panches/sarpanches against whom the complaints have been received. The list of such panches/sarpanches is given in letter Sr. no. 8370- 75/Panchayat dated 13-12-2022 and the name of respondent no. 5 is also given in at sr. no.5. Since, the matter is already being inquired into by the District Administration as per rules, hence the necessary and proper action will be taken as per rules contained in Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and rules thereof. The copy of letter dated 28-11-2022 and copy of letter dated 13-12- 2022 are annexed as Annexure R-1 and Annexure R-2 respectively for kind perusal of this Hon'ble High court."
6. Learned counsel for the State submits
AI
The court ruled that the inquiry against the Sarpanch was not conducted in accordance with law, and the appellant's qualifications were valid, thus upholding her election.
The Deputy Commissioner had the authority to order the removal of the petitioner under Section 51(3)(b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not possess the minimum qualific....
Disqualification of a Panchayat member due to false educational qualifications is upheld, emphasizing the role of authority in determining eligibility and the binding nature of an agent's actions on ....
Election candidates must provide authentic documentation. Discrepancies in age and qualifications may lead to disqualification.
The court affirmed the legislative authority of the Election Commission to remove elected officials for disqualifications and established the burden of proof for authenticity rests on the individual.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.