Ramesh vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3348

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3348

M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, SUKHVINDER KAUR
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Jain, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kanwardeep, Advocate Mr. Uday Agnihotri, Advocate for non-applicant/respondent No.5.

JUDGMENT

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral)

At request of both the sides, the Letters Patent Appeal bearing No. LPA-309-2023, which was posted for 12.04.2023, is preponed and taken on board today itself.

2. We have heard elaborate submissions yesterday and today made by the counsel for the appellant and counsel for respondent No.5.

3. This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the order dt. 21.11.2022 passed in CWP No.19481 of 2022 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant.

4. In the Writ Petition, the appellant had challenged 4 orders i.e. (i) order dt. 01.06.2022 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, (ii) order dt. 05.01.2021 passed by the Collector, Jhajjar, (iii) order dt.05.11.2019 and (iv) order dt.08.03.2019 passed by the Assistant Collector, Grade-I, Jhajjar in partition application No. 17/NT under the Punjab Land Revenue Act.

The order of the learned single judge

5. In the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, the learned Single Judge upheld all these orders.

6. After recording the contentions of the parties, the learned Single Judge considered the question whether the Revision filed by the Writ Petitioner b