SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1071

MANISHA BATRA
Satender – Appellant
Versus
Sunil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Dhankhar, Advocate; For the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Manisha Batra, J.

The instant revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 14.07.2016 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani in Maintenance Petition No.MNT-46 of 2015 titled as Smt. Sunil and another v. Satender as filed under Section 127 of Code of Criminal Procedure whereby, he was directed to pay enhanced amount of maintenance.

2. As culled out from the record, the respondents had filed a petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. bearing No.308 of 2012 titled as Sunil and another v. Satender, seeking maintenance, from the present petitioner being his wife and daughter respectively. The said petition had been disposed of on 05.04.2013 in view of a statement given by the petitioner that he was ready to pay an amount of Rs.5000/- per month to each of the respondents. Subsequently, the respondents filed the aforementioned petition under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement in the amount of maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month as per order dated 05.04.2013. The learned Family Court after considering the rival claims of the parties and appraising the evidence produced by them, partly allowed this petition vide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top