SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3439

MANOJ BAJAJ
Jaspreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Magistrate – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate; For the Petitioner
None; For the Respondents

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks pre-ponement due to electricity disconnection. (Para 1)
2. respondent’s absence indicates case delay tactics. (Para 3 , 4)
3. transfer deed under dispute; allegations of neglect. (Para 5 , 6)
4. proceedings were in response to significant prior claims. (Para 7)
5. court highlights misleading claims and previous decisions. (Para 8)
6. court sets aside impugned decision based on merit. (Para 9 , 10)
7. refund ordered due to misleading information. (Para 11)
8. additional applications not entertained due to merits ruling. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Bajaj, J.

CM-6562-CWP-2023

The applicant-petitioner vide application bearing No. CM-6562-CWP-2023 has sought pre-ponement of the case on the ground that the senior citizen has got the electricity disconnected from the property in question, which was transferred in favour of the grandson-petitioner, where his father-Harvinder Singh is running a welding shop.

2. Heard the learned counsel for applicant-petitioner.

3. The advance copy of this application was supplied to learned counsel for respondent No.2 on 17.04.2023, however, on 28.04.2023 when the application was listed, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top