SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3439

MANOJ BAJAJ
Jaspreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Magistrate – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate; For the Petitioner
None; For the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Manoj Bajaj, J.

CM-6562-CWP-2023

The applicant-petitioner vide application bearing No. CM-6562-CWP-2023 has sought pre-ponement of the case on the ground that the senior citizen has got the electricity disconnected from the property in question, which was transferred in favour of the grandson-petitioner, where his father-Harvinder Singh is running a welding shop.

2. Heard the learned counsel for applicant-petitioner.

3. The advance copy of this application was supplied to learned counsel for respondent No.2 on 17.04.2023, however, on 28.04.2023 when the application was listed, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 failed to put an appearance, though his name reflected the cause list. Today, again no one has chosen to put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2/non-applicant, despite his name is shown in the cause list as well as on the display boards. This shows that the respondent No. 2 is trying to delay the adjudication of this case.

4. Considering the application, the same is allowed and the date of hearing is pre-poned today.

Main case

5. Petitioner-Jaspreet Singh has filed this writ petition under Article 226 Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top