N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Sahab Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. N.S.Shekhawat, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 01.12.2004 and order of sentence dated 06.12.2004, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Kurukshetra, whereby the appellants have been convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 307 , 323, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and were sentenced as under:-
Under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE
Rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000,/- each. In default of payment of fine, they shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.
Under Section 506 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE
Rigorous imprisonment for six months.
2. During the pendency of the present appeal, Sher Singh, appellant No.2 had expired and the appeal was pursued only on behalf of appellant No.1 Sahab Singh.
3. The brief facts of the prosecution are that on receipt of a ruqa from Community Health Centre, Shahabad on 17.10.2001, ASI Kartar Singh reached there and inquired about the injured Balkar Singh. However, he was informed that Balkar Singh, injured had been referred to the PGI,
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Piara Singh v. State of Punjab
The court can exercise its inherent powers to compound non-compoundable offences based on settlement and marriage between the parties, considering the peaceful nature of the dispute and the principle....
The distinction between compounding offences and quashing proceedings is crucial; quashing may be warranted even for non-compoundable offences if a settlement exists.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.