N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Gurdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.S.Shekhawat, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.08.2011 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib whereby, the present appellants stand convicted under Sections 308 /34 and 323/34 IPC and sentenced, as mentioned below:-
| Major Singh | U/s 308/34 IPC | He is sentenced to undergo RI for three years alongwith fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for two months. |
| U/s 323/34 IPC | He is sentenced to undergo RI for one year alongwith fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one month. | |
| Jagsir Singh | U/s 308/34 IPC | He is sentenced to undergo RI for three years alongwith fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for two months. |
| U/s 323/34 IPC | He is sentenced to undergo RI for one year alongwith fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one month. | |
| Sukha Singh | U/s 308 | IPC He is sentenced to undergo RI for five years alongwith fine of Rs.3000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for four months. |
| U/s 323/34 IPC |
Minor inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony do not undermine the overall credibility of the case, particularly when witnesses have sustained injuries and evidence reflects a disproportionate respon....
The admissibility of documents and witness testimonies is crucial in establishing a case beyond reasonable doubt.
The court ruled that allegations of grievous injuries justified denial of anticipatory bail due to the severity of the charges and roles of the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.