SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAMIT KUMAR, J.
Karnail Singh – Petitioner
Versus
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO.2535 of 2024
Decided On : 06-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Rupinder Kaur, Advocate; For the Petitioner

Claims for promotional increments must be raised within a reasonable time, particularly before retirement; delay can bar relief.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petition for promotional increment - Claim for promotional increment on completion of 23 years of service rejected due to non-fulfillment of conditions in Finance Circular No. 20/2000 - Petitioner retired in 2006 and raised claim after 18 years, deemed stale - Court emphasized the principle of delay and laches in service matters. (Paras 1, 5, 6, 18)

(B) Delay and Laches - The court reiterated that claims raised after retirement, especially those not agitated during service, are subject to dismissal on grounds of delay and laches, as established in various precedents. (Paras 6, 10, 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a retired employee, sought a promotional increment based on service duration, but his claim was rejected due to not meeting specific conditions outlined in finance circulars.

Findings of Court:
The court found the claim to be stale as it was raised 18 years post-retirement, emphasizing the importance of timely action in service-related claims.

Issues: The main issues included the applicability of finance circulars and the impact of delay in raising the claim post-retirement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner’s claim was not valid due to failure to meet the necessary conditions and the significant delay in raising the issue after retirement.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Namit Kumar, J.

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by filing the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 29.08.2023 (Annexure P-5) whereby his claim for grant of promotional increment on completion of 23 years of regular service in view of circular dated 23.04.1990 has been rejected. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought to grant the benefit of promotional increment to the petitioner, in view of circulars dated 23.04.1990 (Annexure P-1) and 28.07.2000 (Annexure P-3).

2. Brief facts, as have been emanated from the petition, are that the petitioner joined as Lower Division Clerk (LDC) on 21.04.1970 in the erstwhile Electricity Board (now PSPCL). He was granted second time bound promotional scale on 21.09.1989 after 16 years of regular service. It has been averred that the petitioner was entitled for third promotion increment on 20.09.1996. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.08.2006 from the post of Upper Division Clerk (UDC). Petitioner is claiming the promotional increment on completion of 23 years service in terms of circular dated 23.04.1990 (Annexure P-1). It has further been pleaded in the petition that the petitioner along with others had earlier filed CWP No.2346 of 2017 - Darshan Lal and others v. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others, in which he was petitioner No.3. The said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 27.03.2023 along with a bunch of petitions in terms of directions issued in CWP No.27130 of 2019 - Shavinder Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others. The concluding paras of order dated 27.03.2023 read as under: -

    "4. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present writ petitions can also be disposed off in terms thereof. Resultantly, the present writ petitions are disposed off in the light of directions issued in the case of Shavinder Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others (supra).

    5. The petitioners are allowed to raise their grievance before the respondent-Corporation up to 30th of May, 2023. In case any of the petitioner raises his grievance with regard to declining of the claim by the authorities concerned, the Corporation shall reconsider his claim in the light of law laid down by this Court in the case of Nirmala Rani (supra) and shall also adjudge the same after taking into consideration deletion of conditions as effectuated by instructions dated 1st of October, 2018 within a period of 3 months from the receipt of the representation received by the petitioner(s).

    6. In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for their respective benefits, the same shall be released within a period of 8 weeks thereafter.

    7. However, in case the authorities find that the claim of the petitioners does not merit acceptance, the same shall be adjudicated by passing a speaking order.

    A copy of this order be kept on the files of other connected cases.

    March 27, 2023

Sd/-

(Pankaj Jain)

Judge"

3. The case of the petitioner was considered by the respondent-Corporation and has been rejected vide order dated 29.08.2023 impugned herein with the following reasons: -

    "Finance Circular No. 20/2000 dated 28.07.2000 for grant of 23 years of promotional benefits had following conditions:

    1) He/she has the avenue of three promotions but has not earned three regular promotions in his/her regular service from the date of joining on the induction post/or any other post specifically declared as induction post for granting time bound promotional/devised promotional scale.

    2) He/she has not earned third promotion in his/her regular service between 16th and 23rd years of service.

    3) He/she has not been placed in a scale which is higher than the scale of his/her next higher post.

    4) The increment(s) are in the nature of advance promotional benefits to be absorbed in the next regular promotion.

    5) Those who forego promotion shall not b

                                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                            supreme today icon
                                                            logo-black

                                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                            qr

                                                            Scan Me!

                                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top