Back
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
PEPSU Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Dev Raj – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.(Oral)
Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 01.08.1996 passed by respondent No.2-Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot, whereby the claim of the petitioner-Transport Corporation was restricted to a period of three years prior to the institution of proceedings for eviction and recovery.
2. As per the averments contained in the present writ petition, the petitioner-Corporation is owner of shop No.4 situated on Court Road Bathinda and that a public auction was held on 19.03.1986 for giving the aforesaid shop on lease. Respondent No.1-Dev Raj, participated in the same and submitted a bid of Rs. 1,525/- per month, however, the highest bid was submitted by one Bhushan Kumar for an amount of Rs. 1,600/- per month. However, notwithstanding the submission of the highest bid by another bidder, respondent No.1 forcefully and illegally occupied the aforesaid shop on 20.03.1986. A number of oral as well as written requests were made to respondent No.1 to handover the vacant possession of the shop which had been illegally occupied by him. Respondent No.1, however, filed a civil suit No.760/17.11.1988 before the Sub-Judge IInd Class, Bat
The court affirmed that claims for recovery of dues under the Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction & Recovery) Act are subject to a three-year limitation period, which the petitioner failed to a....
The court emphasized that eviction under the Public Premises Act requires subjective satisfaction of unauthorized occupation, ensuring fairness in administrative actions.
Rule 1 Order XXIX of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 "Subscription and verification of pleading" In suits by or against a corporation, any pleading may be signed and verified on behalf of corporation by....
The court upheld the plaintiff's lawful claim over the disputed property, affirming that encroachment by the defendant was illegal and the suit was filed within the prescribed limitation period.
The plea of violation of principles of natural justice is not entitled to be accepted unless it is shown that rights of a party have been prejudicially affected.
The recovery of rent due to the Nagar Palika from a tenant in respect of immovable property other than land vested or entrusted to the management of the Nagar Palika can be made under Section 292 of ....
The principle of natural justice requires that procedural irregularities do not invalidate decisions unless they cause prejudice, affirming the legitimacy of governmental actions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
