IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL, J.
Samaj Mandir & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Karnal & Anr. – Respondents
CWP NO. 9340 of 2023
Decided On : 08-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction of encroachers on municipal land (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim of ownership based on jamabandi (Para 3) |
| 3. court's validation of municipal ownership (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed, no merit found (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)
This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order dated 15.07.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Court of Joint Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Karnal (respondent No.2) and order dated 22.03.2023 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Court of the Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority, Municipal Corporation, Karnal, vide which, the petitioners were directed to vacate the premises/land in question.
2. The brief facts of the present case are that on the complaint of one Ashok Kumar and other residents of Village Daha Jagir, in which, it was alleged that the petitioners had encroached upon the land owned by the Municipal Corporation, Karnal and an inquiry was conducted and it was found that the petitioners had encroached upon the land measuring 15 kanals 18 marlas comprised in Khewat No.543, Khatauni No.673, Rectangle No.22, Khasra No.8(8-0), 13/2(7-18) situated in Village Daha, Tehsil and District Karnal which was under the ownership of Municipal Corporation, Karnal. A petition No.111 dated 27.09.2018 was filed by the Municipal Corporation, Karnal under Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 7 of the Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 and after receipt of the same, a show cause notice under Section 4 08 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 was issued vide Memo No.1/MCK dated 06.04.2021 directing the petitioners to vacate the land in question within a period of seven days from the date of service of the said notice. Liberty was granted to the petitioners to file reply to the said show cause notice along with supporting documents and to come present in the office to explain their position. In reply dated 27.04.2021 to the show cause notice dated 06.04.2021, the respondents therein (petitioners herein) had stated that they were not in illegal possession of the land in question and had been in possession of the said land for several years. The Joint Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Karnal, after going through the reply to the show cause notice as well as after hearing both the parties, passed the eviction order under Section 4 08 (A)(2) with directions to the petitioners to vacate the land in question and to demolish the unauthorized construction and to restore it to its original state. In the order, it was observed that as per jamabandi for the year 2014-15, Municipal Corporation, Karnal was shown to be the owner of the land in question and that the petitioners had failed to show any right over the land in question and that they had illegally encroached upon the land measuring 15 kanals 18 marlas. It was further observed that even in the earlier jamabandi for the year 2009-10, Gram Panchayat of Village Daha was shown to be the owner of the land in question and after the Municipal Corporation, Karnal came into operation, the management and control over the property owned by the Gram Panchayat of Village Daha came under the control of the Municipal Corporation, Karnal. An appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed by the Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority, Haryana, vide order dated 22.03.2023. In the said order, reliance was placed upon the abovesaid jamabandi(s) to hold that it was the Municipal Corporation, Karnal who was the owner of the said property and it was also observed that the petitioners had failed to produce any record to show that the land in question was ever allotted to the petitioners. It was found that the petitioners were in unauthorized possession of the land in question and thus, their appeal was dismissed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been in p
AI
A claimant must prove individual cultivating possession prior to 1950 under exclusionary clause provisions for land ownership rights under relevant statutes.
The court emphasized that mere claims of ownership are insufficient; prima facie evidence of title must be established to invoke eviction proceedings under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 4(3)(ii) of the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 in determining the possession and rights of ....
The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a legal right over the property, and eviction must follow due process under the Land Conservancy Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.