Back
ANIL KSHETARPAL
Bhupinder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs – Appellant
Versus
Jaspreet Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.:
In this second appeal, the defendants assail the correctness of the First Appellate Court’s order remitting the matter back to the trial Court for fresh decision.
2. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, some relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.
3. The plaintiff, a minor filed a civil suit for the grant of decree of declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction claiming that the suit property is ancestral joint Hindu family property and he is the owner of 1/4th share in the property. Consequently, the transfer deed dated 07.07.2011, is illegal. The defendants contested the suit. Ultimately, vide judgment and decree dated 05.04.2014, the trial Court dismissed the suit. The plaintiff filed first appeal.
4. During the pendency of the appeal, he filed three applications (i) under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (ii) under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and (iii) Under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’). The First Appellate Court dismissed the application under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC, whereas, par
The First Appellate Court's remittance of a case to the trial Court was improper as it did not follow the procedural requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The appellate court's power to remand is limited to specific conditions under the CPC, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation of the trial court's judgment.
The Appellate Court must set aside the lower court's judgment on merits before remanding a case under Order XLI Rule 23A of the CPC, emphasizing caution in remand orders.
The First Appellate Court's power to remit cases is governed strictly by the CPC, and must only be exercised when necessary to ensure fair trial.
Remand of a case requires substantial grounds and cannot be based solely on procedural errors or the allowance of additional evidence.
Remand of cases must strictly follow the provisions of the CPC, and inherent powers cannot be invoked when specific rules govern the remand process.
The Appellate Court must frame issues based on material propositions and cannot remit cases without necessity for re-appreciation.
Judicial efficiency mandates that remand for fresh disposal should only occur when necessary; a remanding court must determine the parties' shares or justify retrial necessity, which was neglected he....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
