Back
VIKAS BAHL
Sudhir – Appellant
Versus
Pinki Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Bahl, J.
1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the judgment dated 05.09.2022 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani while deciding Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2017 which was instituted on 19.01.2017 titled as Smt. Pinki Sharma Vs. Sudhir and others.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that respondent No. 1 had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter to be referred as “the 2005 Act”) against the present petitioner-her husband and other persons and in the said complaint, as is apparent from para 2 of the order dated 21.12.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhiwani, it was stated that respondent No. 1 was married to the present petitioner on 21.06.2010 and her parents had given sufficient dowry in the marriage and after the marriage, respondent No. 1 started to reside with the petitioner and his family members and thus, she had domestic relationship with them. It was further alleged that the petitioner and his family members raised demands for dowry from the complainant-respondent No. 1 includ
The proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act are independent of those under Section 125 Cr.P.C., allowing for separate maintenance claims.
It is worth mentioning in this context that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was enacted with the objective of providing more effective protection of the rights of women guar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 23 of the Act No. 43 of 2005, which empowers the Magistrate to grant interim monetary relief to aggri....
The findings of the Family Court in a maintenance order under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. do not have a binding effect on the Courts dealing with the DV Act, and the order under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. can....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in modifying maintenance orders and the consideration of the financial status and obligations of the parties.
A husband must ensure his wife’s financial support and maintain her standard of living unless he proves his inability to earn, as emphasized under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the Domestic Violence Act.
The court established that applications for maintenance under the D.V. Act must be properly categorized, and the Magistrate has the authority to modify maintenance orders based on changed circumstanc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
