SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1326

SUMEET GOEL
Ekta – Appellant
Versus
Gourav Goel – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Vimal Kumar Gupta, Rohit Singh

JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J.

1. The instant petition has been preferred against the order dated 09.03.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Karnal (hereinafter to be referred as ‘impugned order’) praying for modification of the said order for enhancing the quantum of interim maintenance awarded by the said order. Vide the impugned order; the petitioner No. 2 (minor son herein) has been awarded interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month to be paid by the respondent (herein) from the date of the application alongwith litigation expenses of Rs.5000/- while the petitioner No. 1-wife was denied interim maintenance. The petitioners (herein) had filed a petition, under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., 1973 before the Family Court, Karnal stating that they are the wife and minor son of the respondent (herein) and are unable to maintain themselves and hence the interim maintenance ought to be awarded to them.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has iterated that the learned Family Court has erred in determining the quantum of interim maintenance awarded to the petitioners (herein) insofar as the income of the respondent is concerned. It has been submitted by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top