SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 55

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Charanjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwant Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Bikramjit Singh Baath Adv., Ms. Sushma Sharma Adv. , Mr. Ramesh Sharma Adv.

Table of Content
1. context of loan agreement and cheque issuance. (Para 2)
2. loan being disputed; cheque bounced. (Para 3)
3. arguments on cheque liability and notice. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's analysis of drawer liability. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. complaint quashed due to invalid notice. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

This order shall decide both the above mentioned petitions as they arise from identical factual matrix. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CRM-M-54012-2023.

2. The present petition has been preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking quashing of complaint bearing No. 169 of 2019 titled ‘ Kulwant Singh vs. Jasbir Kaur and Another ’ under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter ‘NI Act’) as well as summoning order dated 19.09.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Samrala and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

3. Briefly, the facts, as alleged, are that in the Month of May, 2018, the petitioner approached the respondent for a friendly loan of Rs.7,50,000/- to expand his business. At the time of taking the said loan, the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top