Back
ALKA SARIN
Gurmukh Singh (deceased) through LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Sukhpal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alka Sarin, J.
The present appeal is by the legal representatives of the plaintiff-appellant against the judgements and decrees dated 26.03.2015 and 25.09.2017 passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court dismissing his suit.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction As per the plaintiff-appellant, Battan Singh (father of the plaintiff-appellant and of defendant-respondent Nos.3 to 5) was the owner in possession of the suit land. Battan Singh had five sons - the plaintiff-appellant, defendant-respondent Nos.3 to 5 and Maha Singh. After the death of Battan Singh, his estate devolved upon his five sons equally to the extent of 1/5 share each. One son, Maha Singh, died unmarried and issueless and thus his estate devolved upon his four brothers to the extent of 1/4 share each. Thus, the plaintiff-appellant has 1/4 share in the suit land. However, the defendant-respondent Nos.1 and 2 claimed a Will in their favour allegedly executed by Maha Singh. As per the plaintiff-appellant the said Will was a result of fraud and forgery and conferred no title of defendant-respondent Nos.1
Exclusion of natural heirs is insufficient to invalidate a Will; the burden of proof lies on the appellant to demonstrate fraud or lack of testamentary capacity.
Validity of the executed will takes precedence over ancestral property claims in absence of sufficient proof.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a convincing explanation of suspicious circumstances surrounding the making of a will, as emphasized in the case of Jaswant ....
The execution of a Will must be proved not only when the statutory requirements for proving the Will are satisfied but the Will is also found to be ordinarily free from suspicious circumstances.
The validity of the Will dated 23.10.2000 and the application of the principle of lis pendens in property disputes.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for valid proof and registration of legal documents such as power of attorney and Will, and the implications of their lack of au....
A Will's validity is upheld unless clear evidence of mental incapacity or undue influence is presented; mere exclusion of heirs does not create suspicion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
