ALKA SARIN
Gurinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Kuldeep Kaur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admission of co-ownership in property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. framing of issues in property suits. (Para 3) |
| 3. dismissal of appeals without merit. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 4. contention of ownership and utility payments. (Para 5) |
| 5. evidence required for establishing ownership. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT :
Alka Sarin, J.
The present appeal is by the defendant No.8-appellant against the judgements and decrees dated 16.11.2016 and 01.10.2019 passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent No.1.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed a suit for possession by partition of a residential house after declaring her as co-owner to the extent of 1/5 share. In the suit a permanent injunction was also sought for restraining the defendant No.8-appellant from making any alterations, changes or delivering the possession of the house in dispute to anybody else. It was averred that the house in dispute was owned and possessed by Rajinder Pal Singh who died intestate without executing any Will and he left behind the plaintiff-respondent No.1 and defendant Nos.1 to 7-respondent Nos.2 to 8 as his heirs. As such the plaintiff-respon
Ownership claims must be supported by formal documentation such as a will or deed; mere occupancy and payment of bills do not confer legal title.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.