Back
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J
1. Relief Sought:-
The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of BNSS , 2023 has been invoked for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.218, dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 409 , 420, 120-B IPC and Section 13 (1), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 as amended vide Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, registered at Police Station Khanna City-2, District Ludhiana.
2. Facts:-
Multiple inquiries into the same allegations infringe upon the right to a fair trial under Article 21, justifying the grant of anticipatory bail.
The court ruled that anticipatory bail was justified due to insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, highlighting the need for careful consideration of allegations and evidence in corruption....
The High Court has the power to reverse the findings of acquittal by a trial court, but it will only do so if there are strong reasons based on evidence which can dislodge the findings arrived at by ....
The court affirmed that the authorities adequately addressed the allegations of procurement violations under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if dissat....
To establish corruption charges, prosecutors must prove the accused's actions are directly linked to official duties, along with credible, corroborated evidence of misconduct.
The court ruled that the allegations against the petitioners did not constitute a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust, warranting the quashing of the FIR due to lack of direct involvement an....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
