SUMEET GOEL
Soni Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and fir details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against the legality of the fir. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's consideration of the fir's legitimacy. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. summary of legal opinions and precedents. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. explanation of inherent judicial powers of the high court. (Para 9) |
| 6. decision to quash fir due to settled case. (Para 10) |
| 7. final order of quashing the fir. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Sumeet Goel, J.
The petition in hand has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS , 2023 with the following substantive prayer:
Continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC is unjust when the related complaint under Section 138 NI Act has been withdrawn following a compromise, affirming the court's role to prevent abus....
Amicable settlement of disputes under Section 138 of the N.I. Act may justify the quashing of proceedings under Section 174-A of the IPC.
The withdrawal of the main complaint under Sections 138/141 of the Act of 1881 due to a compromise between the parties renders the continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A of the IPC an abuse ....
Continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC is an abuse of the process of law when the main complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is withdrawn due to a compromise.
Continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC is an abuse of process of law once the main dispute between the parties has ended.
Continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC after withdrawal of the main complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is an abuse of the process of law and warrants the quashing ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.