IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Anoop Chitkara, J.
Manpreet Singh - Appellant
Vs.
State of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 54875 of 2024
Decided On : 07-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding bail decision. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final conclusion regarding bail. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 141 | 23.06.2024 | City Jagraon, District Ludhiana Rural, Ludhiana | 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D IPC |
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above came before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [ BNSS ], seeking regular bail.
2. In paragraph no.13 of the bail petition, the petitioner-accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents. However, as per the custody certificate dated 19.2.2025, the petitioner is involved in another case/FIR No.137/2019 under Sections 21 /61/85 NDPS Act, PS Gidder Baha.
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:
3. That then the police party conducted nakabandi on Aligarh road in the area of village Kothe Khanjuran. After some time one car No. DL-04-CKH-6559 was seen coming from the side of Aligarh road. One person was driving the car and two more persons were sitting in the car. On seeing the naka of the police party, the driver of the car stopped the car at some distance from the nakabandi. The two persons who were sitting in the car managed to escape from the car due to darkness. But the police party apprehended the driver of the car. On enquiry the driver of the car told his name as Manpreet Singh son of Dulla Singh. He told the names of those persons who managed to escape as Sunny and Deepu.
4. That on search of the car, one envelope was recovered from gear box near driver seat. On search of the envelope counterfeit currency notes were recovered from that envelope. On counting 109 notes of the denomination of Rs. 100/- each i.e. total amount of Rs. 10,900/-, 2 notes of Rs. 200 each i.e. Rs. 400/-, 10 notes of Rs. 500/- each i.e. total Rs. 5,000/-. So total counterfeit currency notes of Rs. 16,300/- were recovered. One printer make EPSON was also recovered from the car. One parcel of currency notes was prepared and it was sealed by the I.O. with his seal BS. The parcel, printer and vehicle were taken into possession by the I.O. The petitioner was arrested in this case by the I.O.
5. That the parcel of counterfeit currency notes has been deposited in the Currency Notes Press, Nasik Road Maharashtra vide letter no. 31428-29/AC-3 dated 14-08-2024 through Senior Constable Harpreet No. 303. Report of the Currency Notes Press is still awaited.
6. That co-accused Sunny and Deepu could not be arrested so far. So this case is still u
Pre-trial incarceration must not equate to punitive post-conviction sentencing; individual rights must be prioritized where the evidence suggests no further custodial necessity.
The seriousness of the offence, the public interest, and the risk of the petitioner tampering with evidence or fleeing from justice were central to the court's decision.
The gravity of the alleged offense and its impact on national security were central to the court's decision.
Active involvement in preparing counterfeit currency and the recovery of semi-finished notes can be crucial factors in denying bail, especially when combined with the petitioner's involvement in othe....
Accused granted bail as continued detention deemed unnecessary despite serious allegations against him.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.