SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 68

ALKA SARIN
Preetjot Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hardeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Namit Gautam Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ajaivir Singh Adv.

Table of Content
1. challenge against order dismissing application for impounding document. (Para 1)
2. reconstruction of lost documents under inherent powers. (Para 2)
3. admission of evidence precludes later objections. (Para 3)
4. court's observations on document examination rules. (Para 5 , 6)
5. revision petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01.09.2018 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana whereby the application filed by defendants No.1 and 2-petitioners for impounding the original agreement to sell dated 30.04.2008 as per Sections 33 and 35 of the Indian STAMP ACT , 1899 was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for defendants No.1 and 2-petitioners would contend that no doubt that only a photocopy of the document was available on the file, however, relying upon the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Kasireddy Satyanarayana V/s State of Andhra Pradesh [2021 (5) ALT 581] it is contended that if the original document, which was filed in the Court and was deficiently stamped, i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top