Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Jyoti – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir and related facts leading to bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner’s claims and opposition from state & complainant. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court’s reasoning based on evidence and circumstances. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions for granting interim bail based on evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final order and conditions for bail. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 412 | 15.09.2024 | Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Mohali | 364, 365, 302, 34, 201 IPC |
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [ BNSS ], seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 17 of the bail petition, the accused declares that she has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:
The court granted interim bail based on the lack of recovered evidence and the weight of suicide notes, emphasizing the need for corroborative proof in serious accusations pending further investigati....
The admissibility of circumstantial evidence and the consideration of the accused's age and cooperation in granting anticipatory bail.
The admissibility of circumstantial evidence and the importance of timely filing of the supplementary report by the investigating agency.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when there are insufficient specific allegations connecting the petitioner to the abetment of suicide, and if custodial interrogation is not required.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
