Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Baljeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Gupta, Ias – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for revival must comply with consent and prior orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT :
ALKA SARIN, J.
CM-14169-CII-2025
1. This is an application for listing the application being CM-914-2019 filed for revival of the main contempt petition, which was dismissed on 22.11.2018.
2. Notice of the application.
3. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and states that he has no objection if the present application is allowed.
4. In view of the above, the present application is allowed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the application being CM-914-2019 is taken on Board today itself.
CM-914-2019
5. This is an application for revival of the main contempt petition which was dismissed on 22.11.2018.
6. Notice of the application.
7. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and states that he has no objection if the present application is allowed.
8. In view of the above, the present application is allowed, and the main contempt petition is restored to its original number and status. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the main contempt petition is also taken on Board today
Contempt petitions must adhere to procedural guidelines established in previous rulings; failure to apply under designated schemes negates claims.
Petitioners' failure to apply as per advertised process negates entitlement to oustee plot.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
