SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 333

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Navraj Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sunny Masih – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vikas Kumar Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J.

CM-18097-CII-2023

This is an application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 163 days in refiling the appeal.

Heard.

In view of averments mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant No.1, the same is allowed and delay of 163 days in refiling the present appeal is condoned.

FAO-5293-2023 (O&M)

1. Present appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.74,93,842/- awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned Tribunal') passed in MACP No. 317 dated 31.05.2017 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The 5 claimants are the widow, the two sons aged 22 and 19 years; and parents of deceased Gurbaj Singh, who was stated to have been about 45 and a half years old at the time of accident.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the learned Tribunal on the basis of pleadings and evidence adduced before it concluded that the deceased-Gurbaj Singh had died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 24.01.2017 due to the ra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top