SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 368

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Jaspreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Anmoljot Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gurbir Singh Sidhu, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Barnala, in HMA -105 of 2025 dated 27.02.2025, whereby the application for waiver of the six months period to record second motion statement in petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife as well as the respondent-husband have jointly submitted that in the present case, a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the petitioner and the respondent for dissolution of marriage between the parties and in the said petition (Annexure P-2), it was stated that the marriage of the parties had taken place on 03.01.2022 and no child was born out of the same and that right from the beginning of the marriage, the nature and behavior of both the parties was different from each other and the relationship deteriorated and since 03.02.2022 both the parties have been residing separately. It was further averred that with the intervention of the relatives and panchayat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top