Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Surjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
The present revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 08.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Gurdaspur whereby the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.07.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Batala has been dismissed.
2. The FIR in the present case came to be registered on 21.08.2000. The judgment of conviction was passed on 05.07.2006 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Batala. The appeal filed against the order of conviction was dismissed on 08.02.2010 by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Gurdaspur. The instant revision petition was filed on 25.02.2010 and has come up for final hearing now i.e. after a period of more than 24 1/2 years from the date of registration of the FIR.
3. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that ASI Jasbir Singh along with other police officials was present at Adda Qila Lal Singh in connection with patrolling duty when Shinda Masih son of Natha Mashih came there and his statement was got recorded to the effect that he was a resident of village Khusipur. On 21.08.2000 when he along with
The judgment highlights that testimony inconsistencies and delay in trial can influence sentencing in criminal negligence cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on the evidence presented by prosecution witnesses to uphold the conviction of the petitioner for rash and negligent driving u....
Negligence in driving leading to fatality can be established without a test identification parade if the identity is corroborated by credible witnesses.
In a prosecution for causing death by negligence under Section 304-A IPC, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle and that their actions we....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on eyewitness testimonies and material evidence to establish the accused's guilt for rash and negligent driving under Sections....
The importance of reliable and consistent evidence in establishing criminal liability, and the standard of care expected from both the driver and the victim in cases involving negligence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of a driver to exercise caution and adhere to traffic rules, emphasizing the need for deterrence in sentencing for offenses related to ras....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
