SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Super Papers – Appellant
Versus
Hitesh Kumar Sahni – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges dismissal of arbitration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel argues for arbitration due to existing agreement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court affirms that eviction matters fall under exclusive jurisdiction of rent controller. (Para 6 , 9)
4. final ruling confirms dismissal of the petition. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Aggarwal, J.

The present revision petition assails the order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Court of learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana vide which the application moved by the present petitioner under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short '1996 Act') for referring the matter to arbitration was dismissed.

2. A petition under the Punjab Rent Act, 1995 (for short 'the 1995 Act') was instituted by the respondents/landlords against the petitioners/tenants for their eviction from the demised premises situated in Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana (fully described in the eviction petition) on the ground of non-payment of Rent of Rs.1,31,61,814/-. An application under Section 8 of the 1996 Act (Annexure P-4) was moved stating that parties to the eviction petition were governed by lease deed dated 15.12.2015 which contained a s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top