SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 556

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manik Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J.

1. The defendant is in second appeal before this Court challenging the concurrent findings returned by the Courts below whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession by way of specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 10.06.2010, along with consequential relief of permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the learned Courts below.

2. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the learned trial Court.

3. Brief facts as averred by the respondents-plaintiffs in the plaint are that appellants-defendants Vijay Singh and Sudesh resident of village Rewali have represented themselves that they are owners in possession of land situated in the area of Village Patti Kalyana, District Panipat and agreed to sell 04 Kanal of land being 2/5 share out of 09K-19 M of land situated in the Revenue Area of Village Patti Kalyana Tehsil and District Panipat comprised in Khewat No.1104/1069, Khatoni no.1155, Rect. No.39, Killa No.2/2/1(3-19), Khewat No.2117/2048, Khatoni No.2205, Rect. No.32, Killa No. 21/2(0-10), 22/2/2(2-9), Rect. No.39, Killa No.2/1. (3-1), Kittas 3 against total sale consideration of Rs.40,50,000/-. Vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top