PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, JASJIT SINGH BEDI, JJ.
Kulwant Kaur And Others - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRA-D-238-DB-2005 (O&M)
Decided on : 11-02-2025
JUDGMENT :
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18/20.01.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Kapurthala.
2. The instant FIR came to be registered on 23.09.2003. The accused-appellants came to be convicted vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18/20.01.2005. The present appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence was filed on 21.03.2005. The matter has come up for final hearing now after more than 21 years of the registration of the FIR.
3. The facts, in brief, are that Sucha Singh complainant, was working at the in Rail Coach Factory, Hussainpur, Kapurthala. His son Sohan Singh (deceased), who was also working at the Rail Coach Factory, Kapurthala, was married to Kulwant Kaur (accused-appellant No.1) daughter of Kashmira Singh, resident of Chhoti Tibbi Jejon, about 12 years ago. From this wedlock, two daughters and one son, were born. Sucha Singh, went came to meet his son, on the night of 22/23.09.2003, at about 10-30/11-00 pm, at his quarter No.2233, near Railway Station, Kapurthala. He knocked at the door of the quarter of Sohan Singh as the same was bolted from inside. He heard shrieks from inside the quarter. He looked into the quarter through a hole in the window, where the cooler was fixed. A light was glowing, inside the quarter. A rope of nylon, had been put in the neck of Sohan Singh, by Nathu Ram alias Laddi (accused-appellant No.3) and he was twisting the same. Gurdev Singh alias Mangi (accused-appellant No.2), was sitting on the chest of Sohan Singh and was pressing the same. Kulwant Kaur, daughter-in-law of Sucha Singh, and wife of Sohan Singh, had pressed his (Sohan Singh's) feet. Gurdev Singh alias Mangi was tying the hands and arms of Sohan Singh, with a scarf (Chunni). Sucha Singh, being perplexed, knocked at the door, with full force. Gurdev Singh alias Mangi and Nathu Ram alias Laddi opened the door and looked at Sucha Singh. They told him that in case he informed the police or raised an alarm, he would also be dealt with in the same manner, in which, Sohan Singh was being dealt with. They further told him that he should run away from the spot. Being afraid, Sucha Singh went to his quarter, situated at the Rail Coach Factory, Hussainpur, Kapurthala. On the morning of 23.09.2003, he told his othe son Sukhwinder Singh and other members of the family about above incident. He alongwith his son Sukhwinder Singh, reached the quarter of Sohan Singh at 7.00 a.m. on 23.09.2003 and saw that the door of the quarter was lying open. The dead body of Sohan Singh was lying there. Sukhwinder Singh was left to guard the dead body of Sohan Singh and Sucha Singh, proceeded towards the Police Station to lodge the report. About one and a half months earlier, Sohan Singh had told Sucha Singh that Kulwant Kaur, his wife, was having illicit relations with Nathu Ram alias Laddi and Gurdev Singh allas Mangi. He had further told Sucha Singh, that both these accused used to come to his quarter quite often. He had also told Sucha Singh that he was apprehending danger to his life at the hands of both these accused. Kulwant Kaur, Gurdev Singh alias Mangi and Nathu Ram alias Laddi, accused-appellants had committed the murder of Sohan Singh on account of illicit relations.
4. On 23.09.2003, Gurmit Singh Inspector/SHO, P.S.City, Kapurthala, had held a picket at Aujla Level Crossing in the area of Kapurthala alongwith other police officials. At about 7.30 a.m, Sucha Singh-complainant came to him at that place and made his statement Ex.PL narrating the allegations as above. It was read over and explained to him, who after admitting the same to be correct, signed it. Thereafter, an endorsement, Ex.PL/1, was appended thereon, by Gurmit Singh, Inspector and a Ruqa was sent to the Police Station, through Des Raj Constable, on the basis whereof, FIR, Ex.PL/3, was recorded by SI Sumandeep Singh. Thereafter, Gurmit Singh, Inspector, afor
Offence of Murder – Conviction set aside - A grave and heinous crime had been committed but when there is no satisfactory proof of guilt - Benefit of doubt to accused appellants.
(1) Courts are expected to be sensitive in cases involving crime against women.(2) Burden of proof – Ordinary rule that applies to criminal trials that onus lies on prosecution to prove guilt of accu....
The court affirmed that in cases of circumstantial evidence, the accused's failure to explain facts within their knowledge can lead to a presumption of guilt under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
The burden of proof under Section 106 of the Evidence Act places a duty on the accused to offer a plausible explanation for the circumstances of the crime, especially in cases of circumstantial evide....
Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act places the burden on the accused to provide a plausible explanation for facts within their special knowledge, and the failure to do so can lead to adverse infer....
The judgment establishes the principle that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The application of Section 106 of t....
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence and the application of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, emphasizing the accused's failure to provide an alibi.
The trial Court's failure to put material circumstances to the accused during examination under Section 313 of the CrPC constituted a serious irregularity, warranting the acquittal of the appellant o....
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Section 302, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain, proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the accused providing an adeq....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.