Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Darshan Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virinder Aggarwal, J.
CM-12417-C-2025
The present application has been filed by the counsel for the appellant, seeking exemption from the requirement of mentioning the NOR number, on the ground that he has only recently been conferred a license by the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, and, as a consequence, his name has not yet been incorporated in the official roll of Advocates.
2. Having carefully perused the application and considered the grounds advanced therein, the same is hereby allowed, subject to all just and equitable exceptions, and without prejudice to the counsel's future adherence to all statutory and procedural formalities as may be prescribed by the Bar Council or this Court.
RSA-3406-2025 (O&M)
By way of the present appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court, Gurdaspur, whereby the suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs was decreed, granting a mandatory injunction directing the appellant to deliver vacant possession of the suit property. The learned First Appellate Court reversed the well-reasoned judgment of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurdaspur, thereby setting aside
In landlord-tenant disputes, a suit for injunction can be maintainable following adequate notice of tenancy termination, regardless of title disputes.
Mandatory injunctions require clear evidence of possession rights; mere claims of permissive possession undermined by admissions establishing tenant status.
The need for the licensor to be vigilant and take prompt action to evict the licensee from the premises after the termination of the license.
Suit for Mandatory Injunction – Where there is construction raised on disputed property alleged to be owned by plaintiffs, appropriate and efficacious remedy available to them was to institute suit f....
In a suit for permanent injunction, if the plaintiff establishes title, a reasonable presumption of lawful possession can be drawn. The defendant's challenge to the title must be examined to determin....
The court reaffirmed that established ownership protects lawful possession, reinforcing the principle that cultivating tenants cannot be evicted without adherence to statutory procedures.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
