PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Kuldeep Singh @ Keepa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The instant appeal is directed against the impugned verdict, as made on 30.5.2013, upon Sessions Case No. 116 of 4.12.2007, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, where through in respect of charges drawn against the accused-appellants qua offences punishable under Sections 392 and 302 IPC, the learned trial Judge concerned, proceeded to record a finding of conviction against the accused-appellants.2. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order of even date, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced both the convicts-appellants in the hereafter extracted manner-

3. All the above imposed sentences of imprisonment, were ordered to run concurrently However, the period of detention undergone by the accused-appellant, during the investigations, and, trial of the case, was, in terms of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C., rather ordered to be set off from the above imposed sentence(s) of imprisonment.
Factual Background
4. The genesis of the prosecution case, becomes embodied in the appeal FIR, to which Ex PA/1 is assigned. As per the prosecution case, on 22.03.2007, Inspector Daljit Singh, SHO of Police Station Sadar Sunam along with other police offic
The conviction was upheld based on strong evidentiary links, including a confession and ballistic evidence, demonstrating the accused's culpability in murder and related firearms offences.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and a weak motive can undermine convictions; corroborated evidence must link defendants to the crime convincingly.
The court emphasized that disclosure statements must be corroborated by credible evidence to establish guilt, and acquittals were upheld due to insufficient evidence against several accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conclusive and creditworthy evidence to support the charges against the accused, especially in cases involving eyewitness testi....
Circumstantial evidence can establish guilt if it forms a complete chain pointing to the accused, even without direct evidence.
The court upheld the conviction based on corroborated witness testimony, emphasizing the admissibility of expert reports without cross-examination if no request was made by the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.