SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1612

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Raj Pal – Appellant
Versus
Sanjiv Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rohit Dheer, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J.

This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 21.08.2024 (Annexure P1) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patti whereby an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filed by defendant No.l for seeking amendment of the written statement, has been rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wishes to amend the written statement so as to make the averments with respect to the agreement-cum-compromise dated 22.10.2015, which as per the case of the petitioner, was effected before the SHO, Police Station City Patti, District Tarn Taran and for the said purpose, wishes to amend para 5 of the preliminary objections of the written statement and also para 7 on merits of the written statement. It is further submitted that due to lack of communication, inadvertence as well as due to lapse of earlier counsel of the petitioner, the said facts could not be incorporated in the written statement. It is submitted that the application filed by the petitioner is meritorious and same deserves to be allowed and the impugned order deserves to be set aside.

3. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top