SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1960

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Gulzar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. Payel Mehta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari seeking setting aside of the order dated 17.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 in Case No. 14 titled 'Gulzar Sigh Vs. Swarn Kaur and another' and order dated 27.03.2023 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.3 in Case No.02/Senior Citizen/Petition 03/2023 titled 'Swaran Kaur Vs. Jasbir Singh and another'.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent No.4, who is the mother of the present petitioner, had transferred 14 share each of the property in question, in favour of the present petitioner and the respondent No.5, who are the sons of respondent No.4, vide transfer deed dated 14.06.2017 (Annexure P-3). In the said transfer deed, it was stated that respondent No.4 is the owner of the property and that the transfer was being made out of her free will and without any fear, with the further stipulation that the beneficiaries i.e. petitioner and respondent No.5 would provide services and basic needs of respondent No.4 according to Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top