SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 908

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Bishamber – Appellant
Versus
Dwarki – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff-petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 07.09.2019 (Annexure P-1) whereby the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for amendment of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for declaration that the plaintiffs (petitioner and proforma respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein) are owners in possession of the land as fully detailed in the plaint. It was the case set up by the plaintiffs that Bhoomla was owner in possession of the suit land and upon his death on 16.11.1974, mutation No.549 was sanctioned on 16.01.1975 in favour of Jahar @ Jaharia, father of the plaintiff-petitioner, Chhotte Lal (defendantrespondent No.2 herein), Smt. Janki, Smt. Anchi, Smt. Mohra and Smt. Panchi. It was further the case set up that Chhotte Lal (defendant respondent No.2 herein) and Smt. Janki, Smt. Anchi, Smt. Mohar and Smt. Panchi daughters of Bhoomla transferred their 5/6th share out of the suit property vide judgment and decree dated 28.07.1975 in favour of Smt. Dwarki (defendant-respondent No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top