SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1135

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
MANISHA BATRA
Kunwar Pal – Appellant
Versus
Satish – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sachin Mittal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S. S. Mor, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Manisha Batra, J. (Oral)

The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 09.09.2011, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram in complaint bearing No. 110 of 2006, titled as Kunwar Pal vs. Satish and another, filed under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'N. I. Act'), whereby respondent No. 1 and respondent No.2-firm were acquitted of the charges framed against them under the aforesaid sections; as well as for setting aside the judgment dated 08.10.2012, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner/complainant had been dismissed by the lower appellate Court.

2. Adumbrated facts as emanating from the record and relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that respondent No. 1/accused, who was proprietor of respondent No. 2-firm, availed loan to the tune of Rs. 5 Lakhs from the petitioner/complainant for a period of one month with a promise to repay the same along with interest. He had issued a cheque bearing number 140558 dated 23.09.2005 in favour of the petitioner to discharge his legally enforceable liability. This cheque was presented with the banker of the petitioner and was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top