SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1155

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sushant Kareer, Advocate, Mr. Akhilesh Barak, Advocate and Mr. Jagtej Singh Kang, Mr. Lekhraj Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Sharma,
For the Respondent:Ms. Palika Monga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Gurminder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.S. Gill, Advocate, Mr. G.S. Beniwal, Advocate and Mr. Nitish Bansal, Mr. Ram Niwas, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Doon, Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Khatkar, Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocate, Ms. Triyyambika Rao, Advocate Ms. Nandita Verma, Mr. Mahipal S. Yadav, Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sehar Navjeet Singh, Mr. Govind Mor, Mr. J.S. Ahlawat, Advocate and Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Jagmohan Bansal, J. (Oral)

By this common order, the above-noted petitions are hereby adjudicated as issues involved and prayer sought in all the petitions are common. For the sake of convenience and with the consent of parties, the facts are borrowed from CWP-13414-2011.

2. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of selection of private respondents to the post of Inspector of Police (Male).

3. The petitioner pursuant to advertisement No.5/2008 dated 22.07.2008 applied for the post of Inspector of Police (Male). The said advertisement was issued by Haiyana Staff Selection Commission (for short, 'HSSC'), Panchkula whereby 20 posts of Inspector of Police (Male) were advertised. 09 posts were earmarked for General Category and remaining were meant for reserved category. Essential qualification for the post was graduation from a recognized University with Hindi and Sanskrit up to matric level.

4. The respondent pursuant to aforesaid advertisement conducted written test comprising of two papers of 100 marks each. The exam was conducted in two sessions i.e. morning and evening. A candidate was required to secur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top